4FISCHER U,BAUM F,OBENAUER S,et al. Comparative study in patients with mierocalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography [J]. Eur Radiol, 2002,12 (11) 2679-2683.
10GAJALOS C, TARTTER P I, BIEIWEISS I J,et al. Mammographic appearance of nonpatpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characleristics[J]. Ann Surg,2002,235(2):246-251.
5Singletary SE, Allred C, Ashley P, et al. Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Breast Cancer[J].J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20(17):3628～3636.
6American College of Radiology: Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)[M]. 3rd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1998.
7Ferranti C, Coopmans GY, Biganzoli E, et al. Relationships between age, mammographic features and pathological tumor characteristics in non-palpable breast cancer [J]. BrJ Radiol, 2000, 73(871) :698 ～ 705.
8Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, et al. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics[J]. Ann Surg, 2002, 235(2):246～251.
9Yang M, Moriya T, Oguma M, et al. Microinvasive ductal carcinoma (T1mic) of the breast. The clinicopathological profile and immunohistochemical features of 28 cases [J]. Pathol Int, 2003, 53(7) :422～428.
10Holland R, PeterseJL, Millis RR, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ:a proposal for a new classification [J]. Semin Diagn Pathol, 1994,11(3):167～180.
