期刊文献+

基于动态博弈的电子支付系统模型及自利性 被引量:1

Dynamic game-based model for electronic payment system and self-interested property
下载PDF
导出
摘要 使用通信顺序进程CSP和博弈理论提出了基于动态博弈的电子支付系统模型,提出了一种电子支付协议的新属性自利性;基于纳什均衡理论给出了自利性的形式化定义,可以用于对电子支付系统安全属性的形式化分析。与以前的工作相比,其主要贡献为:基于CSP事件对参与者的交叠并发和同步行为建模,基于博弈策略理论对协议主体的多种不诚实行为和三种质量的通信媒介建模,可以用于分析协议主体与通信媒介之间的合作和竞争行为;对进程失效和通信失效建模,其中通信失效模型考虑了消息延迟导致的失效,因此可以分析更多失效情况下协议的性质;自利性解决了如何描述协议公平性和计算代价的折中性问题,可以表示以协议主体为中心的性质如匿名性等;证明了在给定条件下协议的公平性蕴涵自利性,反之不成立。 This paper built a dynamic game-based model of electronic ecommerce systems, and presented self-interested property in electronic payment protocol' s. In the model, it gave a formal description of self-interested property, which was used to analyze formally security property of electronic payment protocols. Compared with the previous work, the main contributions are the following. Firstly, modeling channels in different qualities and participants of dishonest behaviors helped to analyze co- operative and adversarial behaviors. Secondly, modeling process failure and channel failure helped to analyze a protocol's se- curity properties in failed environment. Thirdly, self-interested property was applicant to all kinds of electronic payment protocols, and it represented a trade-off between complexity and what they achieve, and that it was applicable in any transaction where participants had different interests to protect such as protecting one' s privacy and accepting items sent by the other party. Fourthly, it has been proved that fairness implies self-interested under some conditions and the inverse is not true.
出处 《计算机应用研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第8期2463-2468,2517,共7页 Application Research of Computers
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60603062) 国家公安部应用创新基金资助项目(2005YYCXHNST095) 湖南省教育厅资助科研项目(07C718) 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(06JJ3035)
关键词 公平性 自利性 电子支付协议 动态博弈 系统模型 纳什均衡 fairness self-interested electronic payment protocol dynamic game system model Nash equilibrium
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1卿斯汉,李改成.公平交换协议的一个形式化模型[J].中国科学(E辑),2005,35(2):161-172. 被引量:9
  • 2QING Sihan1,2,3 & LI Gaicheng1,2,3 1. Engineering Research Center for Information Security Technology, Institute of Software, Chinese Aca- demy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China,2. Beijing Zhongke Ansheng Corporation of Information Technology, Beijing 100080, China,3. Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China.A formal model of fair exchange protocols[J].Science in China(Series F),2005,48(4):499-512. 被引量:9

二级参考文献8

  • 1Jim Davies, Jim Woodcock. Using Z: Specification, Refinement and Proof. Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science, 1996.
  • 2Asokan. Fairness in Electronic Commerce. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, May 1998.
  • 3Steve KREMER Formal Analysis of Optimistic Fair Exchange Protocols. PhD thesis, Universit'e Libre de Bruxelles Facult'e des Sciences, 2003-2004.
  • 4Rohit Chadha, Max Kanovich, Andre Scedrov. Inductive methods and contract signing protocols. In:Pierangela Samarati, ed. 8th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Philadelphia,PA: ACM Press, November 2001, 176-185.
  • 5Steve A. Schneider. Formal analysis of a non-repudiation protocol. In: 11th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop, Washington-Brussels-Tokyo, IEEE June, 1998. 54-65.
  • 6Giampaolo Bella, Lawrence C. Paulson. Mechanical proofs about a nonrepudiation protocol. In: Richard J.Boulton, Paul B. Jackson, ed. Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics, volume 2152 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, 2001, 91-104.
  • 7Colin Boyd ,Peter Kearney. Exploring fair exchange protocols using speci.cationanimation. In: Joseph Pieprzyk, Eiji Okamoto, Jennifer Seberry, ed. Information Security-International Workshop on Information Security, volume 1975 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science,Wollogong, Australia, Springer-Verlag.December 2000.
  • 8卿斯汉.安全协议的设计与逻辑分析[J].软件学报,2003,14(7):1300-1309. 被引量:69

共引文献16

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部