期刊文献+

本科护理学专业教材质量评价指标体系的构建 被引量:6

Construction of quality evaluation index system for special teaching materials of university nursing students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]为适应本科护理学教材发展需求,构建本科护理学专业教材质量评价指标体系。[方法]选择有本科护理学教材编写或管理经验,相关专业工作10年以上且具有中级以上专业技术职务的专家57名,采用德尔斐法(Delphitech-nique)进行两轮专家咨询,确定指标;根据专家对各指标的赋值情况,运用专家排序法原理设置指标的权重。[结果]构成框架为4个一级指标、15个二级指标、34个三级本科护理专业教材质量评价指标体系,各指标专家赋值均满足均数>3.50分,满分比>0.20,变异系数<0.25,专家意见达成一致。4个一级指标权重分别为0.27、0.31、0.22、0.20。[结论]构建了科学可信的本科护理学专业教材质量评价指标体系,为提高本科护理学教材质量提供了决策依据。 Objective: In order to suit to the needs of the development of teaching materials of baccalaureate nursing science and to provide some decision- making evidences for enhancing the quality of teaching materials of baccalaureate nursing science, quality evaluation index system of teaching material for baccalaureate nursing have been constructed. Methods:A total of 57 experts were selected who had experiences on compiling of baccalaureate nursing science teaching material or management, and had engaged in related specialty for more than ten years and special technology duty above middle level. By adopting Delphi technique to counsel experts for two rounds,indexes were determined. According to valuation of experts about each index,the weight of every index has been set up by using expert precedence ordering principles. Results: The construction framework was including 4 of the first class indexes,15 of the second class indexes and 34 of the third class indexes as a quality evaluation index system for special teaching material of baccalaureate nursing students. Expert valuations of every index could meet to the average 〉3.50,full marks ratio 〉0.20,and coefficient of variability 〈0.25. And the weights of 4 of the first class indexes were 0. 27 ,0. 31,0. 22 and 0.20 respectively. Conclusion: A scientific and reliable quality evaluation index system for special teaching materials of baccalaureate nursing science has been constructed.
出处 《护理研究(上旬版)》 2008年第10期2609-2611,共3页 Chinese Nursing Researsh
关键词 本科 护理学 教育 教材 评价研究 baccalaureate nursing science education teaching material evaluation study
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献19

共引文献135

同被引文献53

引证文献6

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部