摘要
对2001~2005年JCR(Journal Citation Repons)社会科学版的主要计量指标,如总载文数(total articles)、总被引数(total cites)、影响因子(impact factor)、即年指标(immediacy index)、被引半衰期(cited half-life)等,从学科分布的角度进行考察,认为从JCR各项指标出发探讨研究人员在学术交流和引用科研成果行为方面存在着学科差异在一定程度上是可行的,同时对学科发展越成熟,各个指标的稳定性越好,自然科学研究导向性越明显,各个指标的数值相对越高的规律进行揭示 。
This paper analyzes the main indices of Journal Citation Reports, such as total articles, total cites, impact factor, immediacy index and cited half-life from 2001 to 2005 and then discusses the factors influencing the changes of these indices during the five years, finally comes to a conclusion that it is feasible to analyzes the subjects differences of scholar communications and citation behavior to some extent and the more mature the subject is, the more stable the indices are, the more apparent of scientific research orientation is, the higher the indices are.
出处
《情报学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第5期748-754,共7页
Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information
基金
本文系国家社会科学基金重点资助项目“我国人文社会科学研究评价体系的构建与实证分析”(批准号05AZX004)的研究成果之一.
关键词
JCR
期刊
学科
信息计量学
交流
JCR, journal, subject, informetrics, communication