摘要
本项多中心临床研究旨在评价国产clarithromycin(CRM)的安全性和有效性。124例被确诊为急性呼吸道感染、皮肤软组织感染的成年患者入选随机对照试验。进口CRM作对照药。患者被随机地分入国产或进口CRM组。两药均按250mg,q12h给药,疗程7~14d。国产CRM组临床总有效率为91.9%,细菌清除率92.6%,不良反应发生率7.5%;对照组进口CRM分别为91.9%、91.1%和7.69%。以上结果经统计学处理,无显著性差异(P>0.05)。开放试验包括45例急性细菌性感染病例,临床有效率为86.7%,细菌清除率87.8%,不良反应发生率6.7%。由以上结果可见,国产与进口CRM治疗急性细菌性感染同样安全。
The efficacy and safety of domestic clarithromycin were evaluated in the multicentre study. One hundred and twentyfour adult patients with acute respiratory tract infections; acute skin and soft tissue infections were enrolled in randomized controlled clinical trial. Imported clarithromycin was chosen as a control drug. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either domestic clarithromycin or imported one, both drugs were administered 250mg q12h for seven to forteen days. Overall, the clinical efficacy rate of domestic clarithromycin group was 91.9%, the bacterial clearence rate was 92.6%, the incidental rate of adverse drug reaction was 7.57%. Imported clarithromycin group was 91.9%, 91.1% and 7.69% respectively. There was no significant statistical differences between them (P>0.05). The open group included 45 cases acute bacterial infections. The clinical efficacy rate was 86.7%; the bacterial clearence rate was 87.8%; the incidence of adverse drug reaction was 6.7%. It was concluded that domestic clarithromycin is as effective and well tolerated as imported clarithromycin with acute bacterial infections.
出处
《中国抗生素杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
1997年第6期455-464,共10页
Chinese Journal of Antibiotics
基金
国家医药管理局八五攻关项目