摘要
崔述在撰著《考信录》时,严格遵循卫道、尊经的学术原则,坚决维护儒家道统的权威,以《六经》所载作为评判古史古书真伪的标准。这些原则,适应了当时社会对于学术研究的要求,有其合理性,但又在一定程度上导致崔述的学术研究存在证据不足、结论武断的弊端。剖析崔述著述的卫道尊经原则,对于客观理解与公正评价崔述的古史考证成就有着重要意义。
Cuishu strictly abides by the academic principles of defending conventional feudal values and respecting Confucian- ism writing Kao Xin Lu, firmly defends the authority of Confucian doctrines and takes the six Confucian scriptures as the standard for judging the truth or falsehood of Chinese ancient history and ancient books. These principles suited the social re- quirement of scholarship of the time, so were reasonable, but they led Cui's studies to some limitations such as the lack of proof or the arbitrariness of conclusion. The analysis of Cui's principles of defending conventional feudal values and respecting Confucianism is helpful to understand objectively and appraise fairly Cui's achievements in the field of Chinese ancient history studies.
出处
《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2008年第4期104-107,共4页
Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
崔述
考信录
卫道
尊经
原则
Cuishu
Kao Xin Lu
defending conventional feudal values and respecting Confucianism
the principles of scholarship