期刊文献+

首次急症剖宫产术从决定手术至切皮时间间期与母婴结局的关系 被引量:6

Decision-to incision interval and maternal and infant outcomes
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:研究急症剖宫产术从决定手术至切皮时间间期(DII)与母婴结局的相关性,评估昆明医学院第一附属医院目前对产科急症的应急能力。方法:对2000年1月1日~2006年9月30日期间在产科住院分娩的部分急症剖宫产术(ECS)进行回顾性队列研究,比较不同DII时间段ECS母婴的不良妊娠结局。结果:在纳入本研究的735例首次ECS病例中,DII的分布范围为10—310min,仅9例(1.2%)的ECS达到DII≤30min;ECS的指征按照构成比依次为:活跃期头位难产383例(52.2%),胎儿窘迫320例(43.8%),脐带脱垂12例(1.6%),胎盘早剥10例(1.4%),前置胎盘10例(1.4%),本研究病例中无子宫破裂和剖宫产术中脏器损伤者;以DII30min为组距将病例分为6组,各组间母亲和新生儿不良结局的发生率均无统计学显著差异;将相同病例分为DII≤75min和DII〉75min两组,两组间母亲和新生儿不良结局的发生率也没有显著统计学差异;以活跃期头位难产为指征的383例以及以胎儿宫内窘迫为指征的320例病例分为DII≤75min和DII〉75min两组,两组间母亲和新生儿不良结局的发生率均无显著统计学差异。结论:该院真实医疗现状极难达到DII≤30min的国际标准。在以非危急ECS指征为主的一般急症剖宫产中,未发现DII〉75min增加母婴不良结局。 Objective: To measure the relation between decision - to incision interval and maternal and neonatal outcomes in a cobert of women undergoing emergency cesarean deliveries at the first Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical College, and evaluate the response to the obstetric emergency circumstances. Methods: All women undergoing a primary cesarean delivery at our hospital during a 6 year and 9 month span were ascertained. Emergency procedures were defined as those performed for umbilical cord prolapse, placental abruption, placenta previa with hemorrhage, non- reassuring fetal heart rate pattern, dystocia in cephalic presentation and uterine rupture. Detailed information regarding maternal and neonatal outcomes, as well as the interval from the decision time to perform cesarean delivery to the actual skin incision, were collected. Results: 735 were performed for an emergency indication. Of these, only 1. 2% began within 30 minutes of the decision to operate. The majority of ECS indications were non - reassuring heart rate tracings and dystocia in cephalic presentation. No maternal operative injury and uterine rupture occurred. Comparing with infants delivered within 75 minutes, there were no differences in maternal or infant outcomes for decision to incision interval more than 75 minutes. Conclusion: In our hospital, the international standards of DII 〈 30 minutes is difficult to be achieved. For the non - crash Cesarean section DII more than 75 minutes didn't be found to be associated with poorer maternal and infant outeomes.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第30期4256-4259,共4页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 云南省科技厅2001年攻关项目(No.2001NG51)
关键词 急症剖宫产术 时间间期 母婴结局 Emergency cesarean section Decision -to incision interval Maternal and infant outcomes
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 4th ed. Washington, DC : American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1997
  • 2Thomas J, Pamnjothy S, James D. 2004. National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section. British Medical Journa, 1328:665 -670
  • 3Nasrallah FK, Harirah HM, Vadhera R. The 30 - minute decision - to - incision interval for emergency cesarean delivery : fact or fiction? Am J Perinatol, 2004, 21 (2): 63
  • 4Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY. Decision - to - Incision Times and Maternal and Infant Outcomes Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 108:6 -11
  • 5Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Scott JR et al. Emergency cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracings. Compliance with ACOG guide-lines. J Reprod Med, 2003, 48 (12): 975
  • 6Holcroft CJ, Graham EM, Penning DH. Cord gas analysis, decision - to - delivery interval and the 30 - minute rule for emergency cesareans. J Pefinatol, 2005, 25 (9): 616
  • 7Samuel Lurie, Vicky Sulema, Bina Kohen - Sacher et al.The decision to delivery interval in emergency and non -urgent cesarean sections Eur J Obstetrics Gynecology and Reprod Bio, 2004, 113:182 -185
  • 8Tuffnell D J, Wilkinson K, Beresford N. Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section - are current standards achievable? Observational case series. BMJ, 2001, 322:1330
  • 9MacKenzie IZ, Cooke I. What is a reasonable time from decision - todelivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries. B JOG, 2002, 109 : 498 - 504
  • 10MacKenzie IZ, Cooke I. Prospective 12 month study of 30 rain decision to delivery intervals for "emergency" caesarean section. BMJ, 2001, 322 : 1334

同被引文献54

  • 1朱春仙,陈宏,黄荷凤.剖宫产术时两种麻醉方式的对比研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(4):253-255. 被引量:22
  • 2刘新伟,Megea Pole.84例全麻剖宫产分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2005,30(4):612-614. 被引量:19
  • 3刘慧敏,徐静.脐带正常附着的胎膜前置血管破裂1例[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2006,7(1):65-65. 被引量:2
  • 4Onah HE,Ibeziako N,Umezulike AC,et al.Decision-delivery interval and perinatal outcome in emergency caesarean sections.Obstet Gynaecol,2005,25 (4):342-346.
  • 5Livermore LJ,Cochrane RM.Decision to delivery interval:a retrospective study of 1 000 emergency caesarean sections.Obstet Gynaeco1,2006,26 (4):307-310.
  • 6Thomas J,Pamnjothy S,James D.National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section.Brit Med J,2004,328(7441):665-670.
  • 7P.K.Irani,M.B.MrcoG.Haematomaoftheumbilicalcord[J].BritishMedical]oumalH].1964.211436-1437.
  • 8徐复旦,石树中,杨雁,等.脐带血肿与新生儿窒息的关系[J].实用妇科与产科杂志,1992,8(5):231.
  • 9CjouannelleM,Giansily-blaizotF,Monpoux,eta1.Spontaneousumbili-calcordhaematomaandcongenitalfactorVIIdeficiency[J].Haemophilia.2012.18(1):24-25.
  • 10Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, et al. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate[J]. ObstetGynecol, 2011, 118(1):29-38.

引证文献6

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部