期刊文献+

中国证券市场涨跌幅限制的磁力效应研究--兼论适当放宽涨停限制的合理性 被引量:20

Magnet effect of price limit in China stock market——A suggestion to broaden the upper price limit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 证券日内价格的涨跌幅限制是抑制市场过度波动最常见的手段之一.磁力效应和冷却效应何者占主导则是该政策争论的焦点.文中提出了一个检验证券市场磁力效应存在性的计量模型,并利用中国证券市场的日内高频交易数据进行了实证分析.研究结果发现了在达到涨停过程中磁力效应存在的证据,而在跌停过程中磁力效应并不明显.在实证的基础上,文中建议适当放宽涨停限制范围,采用涨停限制和跌停限制不对称的方法来提高该交易机制的市场作用. Stock' s daily price limits are one of the most used approaches to restrain the excessive volatility of stock market. But the debate that whether cool effect or magnet effect is the predominant effect becomes the focus of the policy for a long time since it has been put forward. An econometric model is constructed to test the existence of magnet effect in the paper. With China stock market' s intraday trading data, some empirical research is done and shown that there exists strong upward magnet effect but weak downward effect in it. Based on the empirical work, it is suggested that broaden the range of upper limit and use such a mechanism that using asymmetric width between upper limit and low limit to improve its performance.
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期120-128,共9页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
关键词 交易机制 涨跌幅限制 磁力效应 涨跌停不对称 trading mechanism price limits magnet effect volatility spillover
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Andersen T G, Bollerslev T. Intraday periodicity and volatility persistence in financial markets[ J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1997, (4): 115--158.
  • 2Andersen T G, Bollerslev T. DM-Dollar Volatility: Intraday Activity Patterns, Macroeconomic Announcements, and Longer Run Dependencies[J]. Journal of Finance, 1998, (53) : 219--265.
  • 3Brennan M E. A theory of price limits in futures markets[ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1986, (16) : 213--233.
  • 4Berkman H, Onno W S. The influence of daily price limits on trading in Nikkei futures [ J ]. The Journal of Futures Markets, 1998, (18) : 265--279.
  • 5Jagadeesh N, Titman S. Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Market Efficiency [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1993, (48): 65--91.
  • 6Fama E F. Perspectives on October 1987, or what did we learn from the crash? [A] In: R. Kampuis, R. Kormendi, & J. Watson (eds.), Black Monday and the Future of Financial Markets[ M]. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1989.71--82.
  • 7Kuhn B A, Jurserk G J, Locke P. Do circuit breakers moderate volatility? Evidence from October 1989[J]. The Review of Futures Markets, 1991, (10): 136--175.
  • 8Subrahmanyam A. Circuit breakers and market volatility: A theoretical perspective [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1994, (49) : 527--543.
  • 9Lee C M, Ready M J, Seguin P J. Volume, volatility, and New York stock exchange trading halts[J]. Journal of Finance, 1994, (49) : 183--214.
  • 10Choi W S, Lee S B. A Transitory and Asymmetric Properties in Price Limits: Korean Evidence with |ntra-day Data[ R]. Working Paper, Hanyang University, Korea, 2000. 1--55.

同被引文献236

引证文献20

二级引证文献168

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部