期刊文献+

生态足迹视角下的中印经济发展分析

Analysis on Economics Development of China & India from Perspective of Ecological Footprint
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章在分析中国和印度经济发展模式特点的基础上,利用生态足迹理论对中国和印度的历史生态足迹进行对比分析,展示出两国经济发展对生态资源系统的消耗程度,得出在生态足迹指标体系下印度的经济发展模式与中国的经济发展模式相比,显示出相对较好的可持续发展性的结论。 Based on the different economic development approach adopted by China & India, The essay analyses the two countries' economic impact on ecological resources consumption with comparing their historical ecological footprint data, which concludes that India's economic development mode is more sustainable according to ecological footprint indicator.
作者 方雯 曾琰
出处 《生态经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第11期49-52,60,共5页 Ecological Economy
关键词 中国 印度 经济发展 生态足迹 China India economic development ecological footprint
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

  • 1刘宇辉,彭希哲.中国历年生态足迹计算与发展可持续性评估[J].生态学报,2004,24(10):2257-2262. 被引量:221
  • 2徐中明 张志强 程国栋.生态经济学理论方法与应用[M].黄河水利出版社,2003..
  • 3Wackernagel M, Eees W E. Our Ecologic&l footprint: Eeducing Human impact on the Earth[M]. GabriolaPrees New Society PublishingB.C, 1996.
  • 4Wackernagel M, Rees W E. Perceptual and structural barrier to investing in natural capital: Economics from an ecological footprint perspective[J]. Ecological Economics 1997, 20:3--24.
  • 5李薄.生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000..
  • 6四川省统计局.四川省统计年鉴[R].北京:中国统计出版社,2002..
  • 7Robert Costanza. The dynamic of the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 2000, 32: 341 -345.
  • 8Rees W E, Wachernagel M. Monetary analysis: turning a blind eye on sustainability. Ecological Economics,1999, 29: 47-52.
  • 9Rees W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ.Urban. 1992,4:121-130.
  • 10Wachernagel M, Rees W E. Percep-tual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ec-logical Economics, 1997, 20(1): 5-24.

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部