早年创伤问卷简表中文版的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of early trauma inventory-short form

目的评估早年创伤问卷简表（ETI—SF）中文版的信度和效度。方法对265名被试进行ETI—SF中文版的评定，其中正常人42名、抑郁障碍94例，物质滥用者129例，130名在2～4周后重测。结果ETI—SF四种童年创伤维度分量表的Cronbach’s α系数在0．64～0．84之间，全量表Cronbach’s α系数为0．83；重测相关系数在0．65～0．81之间（P〈0．01）；正常对照组各型童年创伤评分显著低于物质滥用和抑郁障碍组，3组中物质滥用组性创伤得分最高，抑郁障碍组情感虐待分最高，ETI—SF能有效区分。结论ETI—SF中文版信度和效度较好，具有临床与科研应用价值。

Objective To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of early trauma inventory-short form （ETI-SF）. Methods The Chinese version of ETI-SF was administered to 265 participants including 42 health controls, 94 depression disorder patients and 129 substance abusers. 130 of them were retested after 2 to 4 weeks. Results The Cronbach＇ s α coefficients of four childhood trauma domains＇ subscales ranged from 0.64 to 0.84 （P 〈 0.01 ）. The Cronbach＇ s α coefficients of the whole scale was 0.88. The test-retest coefficients ranged from 0.65 to 0.81 （P 〈 0.01 ）. Health control group showed significant lower chikdhood trauma experience than depression disorder group and substance abuse group. Among three groups, substance abuse subjects showed highest sexual trauma while depression disorder subjects showed highest emotional abuse. ETI-SF can effectively differentiate different groups. Conclusion The Chinese version of ETI-SF shows acceptable reliability and validity. It＇ s a promising assessment tool to evaluate childhood trauma in future clinical practice and research.