摘要
先予执行的功能是对民事诉讼起保障作用,其保障具体包含了对当事人合法权益的"及时"保护和"有效"保护两方面的内容。但现行先予执行的立法仅体现了对当事人的"及时"保护,缺失对当事人"有效"保护的规定。先予执行立法定位的偏颇和制度设计的不合理,不仅使当事人合法权益得不到充分的保障,也使先予执行制度在我国目前的司法实务中很少得到施行,欲解决先予执行的现存问题,仅进行制度性的修补无济于事,必须基于对当事人合法权益的"有效"保护和对当事人合法权益的"及时"保护,对先予执行制度进行重新立法定位,将先予执行界定为是使债权人的权利得到早日实现、是对未生效的判决赋予执行力。
Gives the prior execution the function is first plays the safeguard role to the civil action, its safeguard has contained specifically "promptly" the protection and "effectively" protects two aspects to the litigant legitimate rights and interests the contents. But present gave the execution the legislation only to manifest first to the litigant "promptly" the protection, the flaw to the litigant "effectively" the protection stipulation. Gives the prior execution legislation localization first biased and system design unreasonable, not only enables the litigant legitimate rights and interests not to be able to obtain the full safeguard, also causes to give first carries out the system very little to obtain the execution in our country present judicature practice, wants to solve gives the prior execution the first extant question, only carries on institutional patching not to help matters, must based on to the litigant legitimate rights and interests "effectively" the protection and to the litigant legitimate rights and interests "promptly" the protection, to gives first carries out the system to carry on legislates the localization, will give the execution limits for will be first enables creditor' s right to obtain soon will realize, will be to the decision which has not become effective entrusts with carries out the strength.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第11期70-75,共6页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
先行执行
功能
及时
有效
立法定位
prior execution
function
prompt
effective
legislative localization