期刊文献+

社交焦虑障碍患者的注意偏向研究 被引量:1

A study on bias attention of social anxiety disorder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探索社交焦虑障碍(SAD)患者注意偏向的特点。方法收集明确诊断为SAD,同时汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)总分小于20分的患者共30例,并设正常对照组共30例。进行一般人口学资料调查表、Liebowitz社交焦虑量表(LSAS)和数字划销测验检查。结果SAD患者在HAMD、LSAS的得分明显高于对照组(P<0.01)。数字划销测验中,SAD组的粗分158.0±23.6、失误分17.6±12.8、得分140.6±31.7、失误率12.1±12.1,对照组的粗分179.4±13.2、失误分11.3±4.0、得分168.1±13.9、失误率6.3±2.3,两组的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中粗分和得分与LSAS显著相关(P<0.05)。结论社交焦虑障碍患者对数字信息,也会发生注意偏向,注意的偏向与当前关注的内容有关。 Objective: To explore the features of bias attention of patients suffer from social anxiety disorder (SAD). Methods : Thirty SAD patients whose Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression (HAMD) scores below 20 were enrolled in test group and the scores of Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) and Number Cancellation Test were compared with normal controls. Results : The HAMD, LSAS scores of SAD patients were significantly higher than those of normal controls (P 〈 0.01 ). The Number Cancellation Test, the total score, missing score, final score and missing rate of SAD patients were respectively 158.0 ± 23.6, 17.6 ±12.8, 140. 6 ±31.7 and 12.1 ± 12.1 while that of normal controls were 179.4 ±13.2, 11.3 ±4.0, 168.1 ± 13.9 and 6. 3 ±2.3. Each couple of results has significant differences between two groups ( P 〈 0.05 ). The total scores and final scores were negatively correlated with the scores of LSAS ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion: SAD patients have a deficit in digital information as well as bias attention, while the latter is related to the focus of attention.
作者 许桦 张新凯
出处 《上海精神医学》 2008年第5期271-273,共3页 Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry
关键词 社交焦虑障碍 注意偏向 数字划销测验 Social anxiety disorder Bias of attention Number cancellation test
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Foa EB, Kozak MJ. Treatment of anxiety disorders: implications for psychopathology//Tuma AH, Master JD,Eds. Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. Hillsdale NJ : Erlbaum, 1985.
  • 2Hope DA, Gansler DA, Heimberg RG, et al. Attentional focus and causal attribute in social phobia: implications from social psychology. Clin Psychol Rev, 1989, 9 (1) : 49 -60.
  • 3Mathews A, Klug F. Emotionality and interference with color naming in anxiety. Behav Res Ther, 1993, 31 ( 1 ) :57 -62.
  • 4Riemann BC, Mcnally RJ Cognitive processing of personally relevant information. Cognition Emotion, 1995, 9 (44) :325 - 340.
  • 5何燕玲,张明园.Liebowitz社交焦虑量表的信度和效度研究[J].诊断学理论与实践,2004,3(2):89-93. 被引量:67
  • 6Perugi G, Frare F, Toni C, et al. Bipolar Ⅱ and unipolar comorbidity in 153 outpatients with social phobia. Compr Psychiat, 2001, 42 (5) : 375 -381.
  • 7Schneier FR, Johnson J, Hornig CD, et al. Social phobia: comorbidity and morbidity in an epidemiologie sample. Arch Gen Psychiatr, 1992, 49(4) : 282 -288.
  • 8刘素贞,张海音,徐勇,张冰,齐文丽,李知,欧阳泽祥,曹羿郎,胡广芹.心理咨询门诊中社交焦虑障碍的共病与功能损害情况调查[J].中国行为医学科学,2003,12(2):223-225. 被引量:2
  • 9Turk CL, Heimberg RG,Luterek JA, et al. Emotion dysregulation in generalized anxiety disorder: a comparison with social anxiety disorder. Cognitive Ther Res, 2005, 29( 1 ) :89 - 106.
  • 10Mogg K, Bradley BP. Selective orienting of attention to masked threat faces in social anxiety. Behav Res Ther, 2002, 40 ( 12 ) : 1403 - 1414.

二级参考文献34

  • 1陈曦,钟杰,钱铭怡.社交焦虑个体的注意偏差实验研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(12):846-849. 被引量:17
  • 2[1]Lepine JP,Pelissolo A.Epidemiology and comorbidity of social anxiety disorder.H.G.M.Westermberg,J.A.den Boer.Focus on psychiatry:Social Anxiety Disorder.SynThesis Publishers,Amsterdam,The Netherlands.
  • 3[2]Lee CK,Kwak YS,Yamamoto J,et al.Psychiatric epidemiology in Korea.Part I:Gender and age differences in Seoul[J].J Nerv Ment Dis,1990,178(4):242-246.
  • 4[3]Hwu HG,Yeh EK,Chang LY.Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in Taiwan defined by the Chinese Diagnostic Interview Schedule [J].Acta Psychiatr Scand,1989,79(2):136-147.
  • 5[4]Liebowitz MR.Social phobia [J].Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry,1987,22:141-173.
  • 6[5]Masia -Warner C,Storch EA,Pincus DB,et al.The Liebowitz social anxiety scale for children and adolescents:an initial psychometric investigation [J].J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2003,42(9):1076-1084.
  • 7[6]Heimberg RG,Homer KJ,Juster HR,et al.Psychometric properties of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale[J].Psychol Med,1999,29(1):199-212.
  • 8[7]Mennin DS,Fresco DM,Heimberg RG,et al Screening for social anxiety disorder in the clinical setting:using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale [J].J Anxiety Disord,2002,16(6):661-673.
  • 9[8]Oakman J,Van Ameringen M,Mancini C,et al.A confirmatory factor analysis of a self -report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale [J].J Clin Psychol,2003,59(1):149-161.
  • 10[9]American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [M].The forth edition.Washington D C:APA,1994.

共引文献98

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部