期刊文献+

不同机械通气方式在新生儿肺出血中的应用比较 被引量:4

High frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates with pulmonary hemorrhage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察高频振荡通气(HFOV)叠加常规机械通气(CMV)的通气方式治疗新生儿肺出血的疗效。方法:将新生儿肺出血18例随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组采用HFOV+CMV治疗,对照组采用CMV治疗,比较两组患儿的呼吸机参数和氧合指标情况。结果:两组病死率无明显差异,HFOV+CMV治疗24h后,氧合指数明显下降且低于CMV对照组,两组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05);患儿的肺出血停止时间、撤机时间比对照组短,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论:HFOV+CMV通气方式对新生儿肺出血能更好改善氧合,减少气道伤,缩短病程,疗效好而安全。 Objective :To investigate and evaluate the application and safety of high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in the treatment of neonates with pulmonary hemorrhage. Methods:The neonates with pulmonary hemorrhage were randomly divided into two groups,treatment group (n=12) and control group (n=12). The treatment group was treated with HFOV,and the control group was treated with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Changes of oxygen and respiratory ventilation parameters were observed in 24 hours be- fore and after the therapy.Results:There was no difference between two groups in neonate mortality;The changes of oxygen parameters in the treatment group (HFOV) were distinctly lower than those in the control group (CMV);There was significant difference between two groups (P〈0.05). There was significant difference between two groups (P〈0.05) in the surviving neonates compared with other parameters (the time of pulmonary hemorrhage and the time of ventilation). Conclusion:Compared HFOV and CMV treatment for neonates with pulmonary hemorrhage, the former is better in ventilation effect and oxygenation improvement, and also more safe and effective.
出处 《现代医药卫生》 2008年第22期3348-3350,共3页 Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
关键词 高频振荡通气 常规机械通气 肺出血 新生儿 High frequency ventilation Conventional mechmlical ventilation Pulmonary hemorrhage Neonate
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1金汉珍,黄德珉,官希吉,等.实用新生儿学[M].第三版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2002.443.
  • 2单小鸥,何时军,严纯雪.机械通气治疗小儿急性肺出血[J].温州医学院学报,2002,32(4):250-251. 被引量:10
  • 3Thompson JM ,Nguyen CD, Lazar RH,et al. Evaluation andmanagement of hemoptysis in infants and children. A reportofnine cases [J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1996,105(7) :516.
  • 4De Feliee C,lafini G, Ginanneschi C,et al.Subclinical ehorioamnionitis :an unrecognized risk factor for severe pulmonary haemorrhage in extremely low birth weight infants[J].Eur J Pediatr,2005,164(2):111.
  • 5孙眉月.高频通气的临床应用[J].临床儿科杂志,2005,23(11):762-764. 被引量:12
  • 6Kharfy TM. High frequency ventilation in the management of verylow-birth-weight infants with ulmonary hemorrhage[J].Am Perinatol, 2004,21(1) : 19.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Clark RH, Gertsmann DR, Null DM, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of high frequency oscillatory and conventional ventilation in respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics, 1992,89: 5 - 12.
  • 2Gertsmann DR, Minton D, Stoddard RA, et al. The PROVO multicentre early high frequency oscillatory ventilation trial: improved pulmonary and clinical outcome in respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics,1996,98:1044 - 1057.
  • 3Keszler M, Donn SM, Bucciarelli RLL, et al. Multicenter controlled trial comparing high-frequency jet ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in newborn infants with pulmonary interstitial emphysema. J Pediatr, 1991,119: 85- 93.
  • 4Carter JM, Gerstmann DR, Clark RH, et al. High frequency oscillatory ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the trentment of acute neonatal respiratory failure. Pediatrics, 1990,85:159 - 164.
  • 5Rimensberger PC, Beghetti M, Hanquinet S, et al. First intention high-frequecy oscillation with early lung volume optimization improves pulmonary outcome in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics, 2000,105:1202 - 1208.
  • 6Mammel MC. High-frequency ventilation. In:Goldsmith JP, Karotkim EH. Assisted ventilation of the neonate.4th ed. Philadelphia :Saunders Co, 2003.183- 201.
  • 7Thome U, Kossel H, Lipowsky G, et al. Randomized comparison of high-frequency ventilation with highrate intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory failure. J Pediatr, 1999,135:39- 46.
  • 8Plavka R, Kopecky P, Sebron V, et al.A prospective randomized comparison of conventional mechanical ventilation and very early high frequency oscillatory ventilation in extremely premature newborns with respiratony distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med, 1999,25: 68 - 75.
  • 9Courtney SE, Durand DJ, Asselin JM, et al. High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth weight infants. N Engl J Med, 2002,347:643 - 652.
  • 10Frantz ID, Werthammer J, Stark AR. High-frequency ventilation in premature infants with lung disease:adequate gas exchange at low tracheal pressure. Pediatrics, 1983,71: 483- 488.

共引文献19

同被引文献55

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部