摘要
目的:探讨贵金属熔附烤瓷牙临床比色、比色仪比色的差异与互补性。方法:选择30例上前牙种植修复患者随机分实验组与对照组,实验组由技师使用比色仪比色,列出瓷粉配比清单,分区堆瓷,烤制修复体,试瓷,磨改,再调色,再烤制修复体;对照组由临床医师使用标准比色板比色,列出瓷粉配比清单,堆瓷,烤制修复体。分别以医师、技工、患者对同一修复体色相、明度、饱和度、与邻牙协调性进行评分,得出满意度。结果:实验组满意度87%,对照组20%;对照组不满意度33.3%,实验组6.7%。结论:技师比色仪结合组比色效果明显优于临床组。
Objective:To Compare color gradation of clinical guide model and computer color-matching technique. Methods: 30 adult patients with mental-ceramic restorations in the anterior maxilla were divided randomly into two groups, clinical guide model by doctor (groups A)and computer color-matching technique by technician (groups B); The effect was evaluated by both patients and dentists 3 and 6 months after restoration.Results:The esthetic results of implant-support prostheses in the groups A are more than the groups B (p〈0.01); The dental implant restoration surface texture ,color variation , transparency and surface character are much more satisfied than the ones (p〈0.01). Conclusion:The computer color-matching methods help to improve esthetic results by using implant-support prostheses in the anterior maxilla.
出处
《中国口腔种植学杂志》
2008年第3期121-123,共3页
Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology
基金
福建省自然科学基金资助项目编号C0310030
关键词
贵金属
烤瓷修复体
种植体
比色
临床研究
mental-ceramic restorations, color ,dental implant, anterior maxilla porthetics