期刊文献+

改良Ashworth量表用于痉挛评定的信度研究 被引量:251

Reliability of clinical measurements obtained with Modified Ashworth Scale in Chinese patients with spasticity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:检验改良的Ashworth量表(MAS)评定肌痉挛患者肌张力时的信度。方法:共收集了23例肌张力增高的患者,其中16例为偏瘫患者,5例为截瘫患者,2例为四肢瘫患者。由两名医生用MAS分别测量偏瘫患者患肢的屈肘肌、屈腕肌和股四头肌的肌张力,而对截瘫患者只测股四头肌,以检验MAS的评定者间和评定者内信度。结果:屈肘、屈腕肌和股四头肌的评定者间和评定者内信度较高(Kendall′s tau-b为0.621-0.862),符合率也较高(≥50%)。结论:MAS是一种可靠的评估肌痉挛的方法,具有临床应用价值。 Objective:To test the reliability of clinical measurements obtained with Modified Ashworth Scale in Chinese patients with spasticity. Method: Twenty-three patients including 16 hemiplegic patients, 5 paraplegic patients and 2 tetraplegic patients, with increasing muscle tone were recruited for this study. Two doctors assessed the muscle tone of elbow flexor, wrist flexor and quadriceps femoris using Modified Ashworth Scale in hemiplegic and tetraplegic patients, whereas assessed only quadriceps femoris in paraplegic patients. The Kendall's tau-b coefficient was calculated to evaluate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities. Result: Interrater and intrarater reliabilities of elbow flexor, wrist flexor and quadriceps femoris were good as indicated by Kendall's tau-b coefficients ranging from 0.621 to 0.862, the agreements between two raters and within one rater were high also. Conclusion: The Modified Ashworth Scale is reliable for the assessment of spasticity, and is valuable for clinical measurements in China.
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期906-909,共4页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 痉挛 改良的Ashworth分级 信度 spasticity modified Ashworth scale reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1郭铁成.痉挛和运动障碍的临床生理.见:窦祖林,主编.痉挛-评估与治疗[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.1-17.
  • 2Barnes MP, Kent RM, Semlyen JK,et al. Spasticity in multiple sclerosis[J]. Veurotehabil Neural Repair,2003,17:66-70.
  • 3Noreau L, Proulx P, Gagnon L, et al. Secondary impairments after spinal cord injury: a population-based study [J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2000,79:526-35.
  • 4Welmer AK, von Arbin M, Widen Holmqvist L, et al. Spasticity and its association with functioning and health-related quality of life 18 months after stroke [J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2006,21:247-53.
  • 5Wichers M J, Odding E, Stam H J, et al. Clinical presentation, associated disorders and aetiological moments in cerebral palsy: a Dutch population-based study [J]. Disabil Rehabil ,2005,27: 583-589.
  • 6Wedekind C, Lippert-Gruner M. Long-term outcome in severe traumatic brain injury is significantly influenced by brainstem involvement[J]. Brain Inj, 2005,19: 681-684.
  • 7Young RR, Emre M, Nance PW, et al. Current issues in spasticity management[J]. The Neurologist, 1997, 3: 261-275.
  • 8Harburn KL, Potter PJ. Spasticity and contraetures[J]. Phys Med Rehabil, 1993, 7:113-132.
  • 9Mutlu A, Livanelioglu A, Gunel MK. Reliability of Ashworth and Modified Ashworth Scales in children with spastic cerebral palsy[J]. BMC Muskuloskelet Disorders, 2008, 9:44.
  • 10Biering-Sφrensen F, Nielsen JB, Klinge K. Spasticity- assessment: a review[J]. Spinal Cord,2006,44:708-722.

二级参考文献1

  • 1孙燕.临床肿瘤内科手册,第3版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.353-355.

共引文献94

同被引文献2269

引证文献251

二级引证文献1792

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部