期刊文献+

两大公司治理模式之比较及其启示 被引量:2

A Comparison Between Two Business Management Models and the Implications
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以英美为代表的外部控制模式和以德国、日本为代表的内部控制模式各有其优缺点,各自适合不同的环境。世界上并不存在最佳的公司治理模式。世界公司治理不应也不会趋同于某一模式。就中国而言,在进行公司治理改革时,不应过于迷信某一模式,而应根据自己的国情来创设或移植公司治理制度。 Neither the external control model represented by UK and US or the internal control model is the best business management model, for each of them has advantages and disadvantages and each fits into different environments. Actually, there is no best business management model in the world. The business management in the world can not be the same. As to China, in the progress of management reform, either the establishment or the transplantation of business management institutions should be based on China^s actual conditions, and any superstitious belief in a certain model should be avoided.
作者 李明辉
出处 《江苏社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期48-54,共7页 Jiangsu Social Sciences
基金 2006年度国家社科基金项目<公司治理全球趋同研究>(批准号:06BJY058)的阶段性成果
关键词 公司治理模式 国际比较 外部控制模式 内部控制模式 制度竞争 business management model international comparison external control model internal control model institutional competition
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1李明辉.公司治理全球趋同:问题与纷争[J].经济评论,2006(1):98-106. 被引量:7
  • 2Jacoby, S. M., 2002.Corporate Governance in Comparative Perspective: Prospects for Convergence. Comparative Labor Law &Policy Journal 22( 1 ):5-32.
  • 3Coffee, J. C., 1999.The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and Its Implications. Northwestern Law Review 93:631-707.
  • 4Hansmann, H. B. and Kraakman, R. H., 2001.The End of History for Corporate Law. Georgetown Law Journal 89: 439-468.
  • 5Khanna, T., Kogan, J. and Palepu, K., 2006. Globalization and Similarities in Corporate Governance: A Cross-Country Analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics 88(1):69-90.
  • 6Maltby, J., and Wilkinson, R., 1998.Stakeholding and Corporate Governance in the UK. Politics18 (3):197-204.
  • 7Deeg, R., 2001. Institutional Change and the Uses and Limits of Path Dependency: the Case of German Finance. MPIfG Discussion Paper 01/6.
  • 8The Business Roundtable, 1997. Statement on Corporate Governance. A White Paper from The Business Roundtable.
  • 9The Business Roundtable, 2002. Principles of Corporate Governance. A White Paper from The Business Roundtable.
  • 10Blair,M.M.,1995.《所有权与控制:面向21世纪的公司治理探索》,张荣刚译,[北京]中国社会科学出版社1999年版.

二级参考文献15

  • 1莫兰德.公司的所有权和控制权结构:一个国际比较[J].经济研究资料,1999,(6).
  • 2G.Jackson.《重视利害关系者的企业模式已近黄昏?—德日公司治理模式比较》,日本产业经济研究所[EB/OL].http.//www.rieti.go.ip/cn/columns/a01-0057.html,2002-10-01.
  • 3青木昌彦 奥野正宽.《经济体制的比较制度分析》 中文版[M].北京:中国发展出版社,1999..
  • 4Aguilera, R. V. and Jackson, G., 2003. "The Cross - National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants."Academy of Management Review,28(3) ,pp.447 - 465.
  • 5Aoki, M., 1994. "The Contingent Governance of Teams :Analysis of Institutional Complementarity." International Economic Review,35(3), pp.657- 676.
  • 6Bebchuk, L. A. and Roe, M. J., 1999. "A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance." Stanford Law Review,52, October, pp. 127 - 170. http://ssrn.com/abstraet = 202748.
  • 7Braendle, U. C. and Noll, J., 2004. On the Convergence of National Corporate Governance Systems. April 1. http://ssrn.com/abstract = 506522.
  • 8Branson, D. M., 2001. "The Very Uncertain Prospect of 'Global' Convergence in Corporate Governance."Comell International Law Journal ,34, pp.321 - 62. http ://ssrn. com/abstract = 244742.
  • 9Buck, T., 2003. "Modem Russian Corporate Governance:Convergent Forces or Product of Russia's Itistory?"Journal of World Business ,38, pp .299 - 313.
  • 10Chefllns, B. R., 2002. "Corporate law and Ownership Structure: A Darwinian Link. http://ssrn.com/abstract = 317661.

共引文献6

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部