期刊文献+

股权制衡可以改善公司治理吗——基于公平与效率视角的实证检验 被引量:24

Can Check-and-balance Ownership Structure Improve Corporate Governance? An Empirical Study Based on the Perspective of Fairness and Efficiency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析了股权制衡可能对公司带来的有利和不利影响,并使用我国上市公司2001-2007年的数据进行了检验。研究结果表明,股权制衡机制可以对大股东的侵占行为产生制约,减轻大股东对公司利益的侵占,从而保护小股东利益,增进公平。但同时,股权制衡会降低决策效率,对公司的经营绩效产生显著的负面影响,这种负面影响在国有控股的公司和业绩好的公司中更为明显。最优股权制衡程度的选择需要在股权制衡带来的提高公平和损失效率两种效应之间进行权衡。 This paper analyzes the advantageous and disadvantageous effects of the check and balance ownership structure, based on the data of China's listed firms from 2001 to 2007. The empirical results show that, the check and balance ownership structure can restrict expropriation, thus protect the benefits of minority shareholders. However, the presence of outside blockholders has significantly negative influences on company's operating performance, especially in the state-owned companies and well-performed companies. Therefore, the optimal ownership structure should be a trade-off between these two effects of enhancing fair and losing efficiency that are brought by the check and balance ownership structure.
作者 张光荣 曾勇
出处 《系统工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第8期71-79,共9页 Systems Engineering
基金 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(教技函[2005]35号)
关键词 公司治理 股权制衡 经营绩效 大股东侵占 Corporate Governance Check-and-balance Ownership Structure, Operating Performance, The Expropriation of Bloekholder
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Berle A, et al. The modern corporation and private property[M]. New York:The Macmillan Company, 1932.
  • 2LaPorta R, et al. Corporate ownership around the world[J]. Journal of Finance, 1999,54 : 471- 517.
  • 3Claessens S, et al. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations [ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000,58 : 81- 112.
  • 4Faccio M, et al. The ultimate ownership of western European corporations[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2002,65 : 365-396.
  • 5Johnson S, et al. Tunneling[J]. American Economic Review, 2000,90 : 22- 27.
  • 6Pagano M, Roell A. The choice of stock ownership structure : agency costs, monitoring, and the decision to go public [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998,113:187-226.
  • 7Bloch F, Hege U. Multiple shareholders and control contests[Z]. HEC School of Management,2001.
  • 8Gomes A, Novaes W. Sharing of control versus monitoring as corporate governance mechanisms[J]. PIER Working paper 01-029, University of Pennsylvania, 2005.
  • 9Volpin P F. Governance with poor investor protection: evidence from top executive turnover in Italy [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2002,64 : 61-90
  • 10Gutierrez M, Tribo J A. Private benefits extraction in closely-held corporations: the case for multiple large shareholders[J]. European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI), Finance Working Paper, No. 53,2004.

二级参考文献108

共引文献1575

同被引文献462

引证文献24

二级引证文献350

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部