期刊文献+

小议WTO争端解决机制中的“法庭之友”陈述

下载PDF
导出
摘要 在WTO争端解决机制中,对于专家组和上诉机构是否可以接受"法庭之友"陈述的问题一直存有较大的争议,虽然在现行的WTO《关于争端解决规则与程序的谅解》(DSU)及其附件中对此问题都没有直接的规定,然而在实践中,"法庭之友"及其陈述却在WTO的众多案件中频频出现。对于在WTO争端解决中是否应该接受"法庭之友"陈述的问题,应该分阶段处理,具体而言,即:应该允许在专家组程序阶段接受"法庭之友"陈述,而在上诉程序阶段则不允许。我国应该充分利用"法庭之友"制度,争取使其能够更好地维护我国的利益。
作者 王景婷
出处 《太原师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第5期86-88,共3页 Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献53

  • 1Peter Lichtenbaum,"Procedural Issues in WTO Dispute Resolution", Michigan Journal of International Law, 19(1195): 1998, p. 1252.Edmond McGovem, International Trade Regulation, GlobeField Press: Exeter,2002, Sec.2.2327 issue 12, p. 2.23-54.
  • 2WT/DS135/R, para. 8.278-8.282.
  • 3Appellate Body Report, Canada- Measures Affecting the Export of Civilian Aircraft, WT/DS 70/AB/R,4 August 2000 (hereinafter WT/DS 70/AB/R), para. 185.
  • 4Panel Report, United States- Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Certain Hot- rolled Lead&Bismuth Carbon Steel Prtxtucts Originating from the United Kingdom,WT/DS138/R,23 December 1999,para. 6.5 - 6.7.
  • 5"WT/DS56/R, para. 6.40,6.58; Edmond McGovern, International Trade Regulation, GlobeField Press:Exeter, 2002, Sec. 2. 2326, issue 13, pp. 2.23 - 44.
  • 6McGovern, Ibid. See. 2. 2326, issue 13, pp. 2.23- 44, footnote 5.
  • 7Panel Report,Canada-Export Credits and Loan Guarantees for Regional Aircraft,WT/DS222/R,28 January 2002(hereinafter WT/DS222/R), para. 7. 384.
  • 8WT/DS 70/AB/R, para. 202,et seq
  • 9Claus-Diter Ehlermann,"Six Years on the Bench of the"World Trade Court:Some personal Experiences as Member of the appellate Body of the World Trade Organization",Journal of World Trade,36(4):2002,p.625
  • 10WT/DS98/AB./R, para. 145.

共引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部