摘要
持有型犯罪行为具有静态性特征,对其主观方面,刑法学界存有诸多争议。根据社会一般人通常应有的经验与常识,对特定物品或财产的持有当然应当出于故意,而且一般通过证明持有事实就可以证明持有故意。对于持有型犯罪来说,持有的核心意思是主体对特定物有意识的控制,而过失谈不上控制。加之我国刑法没有规定过失可以构成持有犯罪,因而过失不能构成该类犯罪的主观罪过。我国刑法犯罪构成理论坚持主客观相统一原则,刑法中不存在"不问主观过错"的犯罪,由此决定了持有型犯罪不能适用严格责任。
The Criminal Holding act has static nature of their objective area. In subjective ,criminal law there are many scholars dispute. According to the general people usually have the experience and knowledge of specific goods or property for a course should be deliberate, and general facts through the proof of the holder can prove that a deliberate. For holders of crime, holding the core is the main means of a specific sense of control, and no fault of control, In addition, China's Criminal Law does not require fault could constitute a crime, therefore mistakes can not constitute the crime of such subjective sin. China's Criminal Law constitute a crime of upholding the principle of unity of the objective and subjective, criminal law does not exist "not asked subjective fault" of the crime, which determines the type of crime can not be applied a strict liability.
出处
《铜仁学院学报》
2008年第5期8-12,共5页
Journal of Tongren University
关键词
持有
故意
过失
严格责任
Hold
Deliberate
Fault
Strict liability