期刊文献+

工程项目风险分析中概率逆换迭代算法的研究

Research of probabilistic inversion iterative algorithm in project item risk analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 概率逆换出现在通过专家判断进行模型参数的不确定风险分析中.由于缺乏基于相应判断的实验,专家往往不能直接评估参数的不确定性.本文对风险分析中的概率逆换算问题进行研究,并通过IPF算法和PARFUM算法得以实现.两种算法的可行性及迭代效果在实例中得到了验证和比较.不仅以数学的形式解决了概率逆换问题,而且使模型中的参数的不确定性得以量化.避免了专家主观估计法可能出现的偏见效应和权威效应. Probabilistie inversion arises in risk and uncertainty analysis when uncertainty distributions over model parameters are obtained via expert judgment. Experts are often unable to assess their uncertainty on these parameters directly, as there are no corresponding experiments on which to base their judgments. This text researches the probabilistic inversion in risk a- nalysis, and gains implement using IPF and PARFUM algorithm, avoids the prejudice and princedom domino offect of expert subjective estimate by probabilistic inversion algorithm.
出处 《天津理工大学学报》 2008年第5期42-43,73,共3页 Journal of Tianjin University of Technology
基金 科技攻关计划重点科技攻关专项项目(05YFGZGX23700).
关键词 概率逆换 概率风险分析 IPF算法 PARFUM算法 probabilistic inversion probabilistic risk analysis IPF algorithm PARFUM algorithm
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1刘铁民.低概率重大事故风险与定量风险评价[J].安全与环境学报,2004,4(2):89-91. 被引量:30
  • 2[3]Santer T J,Duffy D E.The statistical analysis of discrete data[J].Spring-verlag,1999,6(1):113-199.
  • 3[4]Kraan B C P,Cooke R M.Processing expert judgments in accident consequence modeling[J].Management Science,2002,5(3):62-65.
  • 4[5]Tim Bedford,Roger Cooke.Probabilistic risk analysis:foundations and methods[M].Cambridgei:Cambridge University Press,2001.
  • 5[6]Du C,Kurowicka D,Cooke R M.Techniques for generic probabilistic inversion[R].London:Appearing in Computational Statistics and Data Analysis,2003.

二级参考文献5

  • 1[1]Helen Balmforth and Ron Macbeth. Toxic RISKAT Version 3.1, The Inclusion of the Site Risk Methodology[R]. Health & Safety Laboratory, 2002. 27
  • 2[2]Nishapati and Mark. Acceptability and applicability of quantified risk assessment in the next millennium[A]. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-OMAE[C]. OMAE98-1431, 1998. 7
  • 3[3]Laheij G M H, Post J G. and Ale B J M. Standard methods for land-use planning to determine the effects on societal risk[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2000, 71(Jan): 269~282
  • 4[4]Stallen Pieter Jan M, Geerts Rob and Vrijling Han K. Three conceptions of quantified societal risk[J]. Risk Analysis, 1996, 16(Oct): 635~644
  • 5[5]Jorissen R E and Stallen P J M. Quantified societal risk and policy making[A]. In: Technology Risk and Society V12[M]. Dordrecht the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部