期刊文献+

一种考虑所有权重信息的区间交叉效率排序方法 被引量:23

Ranking approach of interval cross efficiency considering all weighting schemes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对交叉效率评价方法中交叉效率不唯一的问题,在分析现有解决方法缺陷的基础上,提出了考虑所有权重信息的区间平均交叉效率,即将所有决策单元的交叉效率值定义在各自的一个区间数上,该区间数考虑了所有决策单元自评时的权重信息,通过比较各决策单元的区间平均交叉效率值,从而可以对所有决策单元进行充分排序,利用该方法能够很好地解决现有方法所存在的部分缺陷。最后通过算例对该方法进行了演示。 With respect to the problem of the non-uniqueness of cross efficiency in cross efficiency evaluation method. the interval average cross efficiency considering all weighting schemes is proposed after analysing the shortcomings of the existed solutions, i.e. the cross efficiencies of all DMUs are defined in a corresponding interval value which included all weighting schemes of all DMUs in self-appraisal, and the rankings of all DMUs can be determined after the interval average cross efficiencies of all DMUs are compared. The approach proposed can be suggested as a remedy for the approaches in existence. In the end, an empirical example is illustrated.
作者 吴杰 梁樑
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期1890-1894,共5页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
基金 国家杰出青年基金(70525001) 中国科学院研究生科学与社会实践基金资助课题
关键词 DEA 交叉效率 权重 区间数 排序 DEA cross efficiency weight interval value ranking
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of deeision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2 (6) : 429- 444.
  • 2Zilla S S, Lea F. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 140 (2) :249- 256.
  • 3Sexton T R, Silkman R H, Hogan A J. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions[C]//Silkman R H ( Ed. ), Measuring efficiency : An assessment of data envelopment analysis, Jossey-Bass , San Francisco, 1986.
  • 4Doyle J R, Green R H. Cross Evaluation in DEA: improving discrimination among DMUs[J]. INFOR, 1995, 33 (3):205 - 222.
  • 5Doyle J R, Green R H. Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, 45 (5) :567 - 578.
  • 6Doyle J, Green R, Cook W D. Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross evaluation[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 90 (3): 461-472.
  • 7吴杰,梁樑.交叉效率评价方法中新单元导入的保序性[J].系统工程,2006,24(7):111-115. 被引量:16
  • 8Norio Hibiki. Evaluation techniques with a modified cross efficiency in DEA[J]. Journal of the Operations Research Society in Japan, 1998, 41(2):229-245.
  • 9Talluri S, Yoon K P. A cone-ratio DEA approach for AMT justification[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2000, 66 (2): 119-129.
  • 10Shang J, Sueyoshi T. A unified framework for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995, 85 (2): 297-315.

二级参考文献45

共引文献225

同被引文献205

引证文献23

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部