期刊文献+

试论西方古典修辞术的政治特质 被引量:1

The Political Particularity of Western Classical Rhetoric
下载PDF
导出
摘要 修辞术是西方的一门古老学问,而且是西方文化传统中一个重要的组成部分。当我们谈到西方修辞术时,常常将之拿来与我们通常所说的汉语修辞学相比较思考。实际上,如果不先深入认识西方修辞术的种种特质的话,任何轻易的比附只会带来模糊和混淆。回到西方修辞术的历史传统,我们发现政治性是其最本质的特质。只有认识了西方修辞术与政治之间的紧密联系,我们才可能真正认识西方修辞术。本文考察了西方古典修辞术从古希腊到古罗马的重要历史演变,试图理清西方古典修辞术与社会政治错综复杂的关系,并由此还原西方古典修辞术本质上的政治特质。 Rhetoric is a kind of the ancient knowledge in western history, and most important part of western cultural tradition. Whenever we talk about western rhetoric, we always like to compare it with the Chinese rhetoric. In fact, we would bring nothing but mistiness and confusion through any comparison unless we apprehend the particularities of western rhetoric. To truly apprehend the western rhetoric, we should get hold of the relation between rhetoric and politics, and appreciate the political particularity of western rhetoric. In this article, the author sorts out the complex relation of sociopolitical condition and the classical rhetoric in western, cultural history of ancient Greek and Roman, and takes the political particularity as the essential of western classical rhetoric.
作者 林志雄
机构地区 嘉应学院社科部
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第5期609-615,共7页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
关键词 修辞术 西方古典修辞术 政治特质 雅典民主制 罗马共和制 rhetoric western classical rhetoric political particularity the democracy of Athens the Roman republican
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[1]Sharon Crowley Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary Students[M].New York:Macmillan College Publishing Company,1994.
  • 2[2]George A.Kennedy.Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times[M].Chapel Hill:IJniversity ofNorth Carolina Press,1980.
  • 3[3]尼采.古修辞描述[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2001.
  • 4[4]亚里士多德.修辞学[M].罗念生,译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2006:75.
  • 5[5]Stanley E.Porter (ed.)Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period(330 B.C.-A.D.400),Leiden:Brill,1997.
  • 6[6]Edward Schiappa.Protagoras and Logos:a Study in Greek Philosophy and Rhetoric.Columbia:University of South Carolina Press,2003.
  • 7[8]柏拉图.斐德若[M].柏拉图全集·第二卷.北京:人民出版社,2002.
  • 8亚里士多德著 吴寿彭译.政治学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1965..
  • 9[5]西塞罗.论演说家[M].王焕生,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
  • 10[12]George Kennedy.The Art of Persuasion in Greece[M].Princeton:Princeton University,1963.

共引文献171

同被引文献18

  • 1http://www.dfyuan.com/gs_about.php?m 1 =gs_about&m2=g s_about&imgmenu=zoujint [EB/01 ].
  • 2Aristotle. The Rhetoric and the Poetics of Aristotle [M]. Translated by Rhys Roberts W. New York: McGraw Hill, 1954.
  • 3Rosenthal, P I. The Concept of Ethos and the Structure of Persuasion [J]. Speech Monographs, 1966(33): 114-126.
  • 4Fontanille, J. Ethos, Pathos, et al. Persuasion: Le Corps dans L'argumentation. Le Cas du.
  • 5Campbell, G. The Philosophy of Rhetoric [M]. Southern Illinois University Press, 1963. Temoignage [J]. Semiotiea, 2007, 163, (1/4): 85-109.
  • 6Hesselgrave, D J. Communicating Christ Cross-Culturally: An Introduction to Missionary Communication [M]. Grand Rapids, MI.: Zondervan Publishing House, 1991.
  • 7Johnstone, Christopher L. Book Review. Quaterly Journal of Speech, 2005(91): 222-227.
  • 8刘亚猛.追求象征的力量[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.2008.
  • 9http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2OO9-O3/20/content_1264324.htm [EB/OL].
  • 10http ://www.bitauto.com/zhuanti/news/mxdy/[EB/OL].

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部