期刊文献+

某煤矸石热电厂新建项目职业病危害预评价 被引量:1

Pre-Evaluation of Occupational Hazards in Construction Project of the Gangue Power Plant
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的识别与分析建设项目职业病危害因素及其危害程度,提出合理、可行的职业病防治措施,为卫生行政部门审批提供技术依据。方法通过现场调查和工程分析,采用类比法进行分析与评价。结果该项目可能存在的主要职业病危害因素有粉尘、有毒物质、噪声和高温等;类比检测结果为工作场所呼吸性粉尘浓度为0.7~12.7mg/m^3,合格率84.1%,工种呼吸性粉尘浓度为0.3~2.2mg/m^3,合格率84.2%;有毒物质检测结果均低于职业接触限值;噪声强度为63.0~100.7dB(A),合格率94.8%,工种噪声强度为63.8—84.3dB(A),合格率100%;工作场所WBGT指数为26.2—31.5℃,均为高温作业点。结论该项目存在的主要职业病危害因素是粉尘和噪声。项目建成投产后,采取有效的职业病防护措施,并加强职业病防治工作,其主要职业病危害是可以预防和控制的。 Objective To identify and analyze the occupational risk factors and harmful degree in the Gangue power plant, and provide technical basis for the health administrative departments. Methods Based on field investigation and engineering analysis, analogy was carried out to evaluate. Results The main occupational risk factors included dust, toxic substances, noise and heat. The analogical project was detected , the concentration of respirable dust in workplace was 0. 7 - 12. 7 mg/m^3, which qualified rate was 84. 1% ; the concentration of respirable dust of trades was 0.3 - 2. 2 mg/m^3, and the qualified rate was 84. 2% ; the values of toxic substances were lower than the occupational exposure limits; noise intensifies were 63.0 - 100. 7 dB ( A), and the qualified rate was 94. 8 % ; the noise intensities of trades were 63.8 - 84.3 dB (2k) , and pass rate was 100% ; WBGT indexes of the workplace were 26. 2 - 31.5℃, which belonged to high temperarure.Conclusion Dust and noise are the main occupational risk factors in the project. The hazards can be prevented and controlled , as long as the protective measures are effectively taken , and the prevention and treatment of occupational diseases are strengthened.
出处 《中国卫生工程学》 CAS 2008年第5期276-278,共3页 Chinese Journal of Public Health Engineering
关键词 煤矸石热电厂 职业病危害 新建项目 预评价 Gangue power plant Occupational hazard Construction project Pre - evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]GBZ 1-2002,工业企业设计卫生标准[S].
  • 2[2]GBZ 2-2002,工作场所有害因素职业接触限值[S].
  • 3[1]GBZ 158-2003,工作场所职业病危害警示标识[S].
  • 4[6]GBZ/T 196-2007,建设项目职业病危害预评价技术导则[S].
  • 5[9]Lahiris,Levenstein C,Nelson DI,et al.The cost effectiveness of occupational health interventions:prevention of silicosis[J].Am J Ind Med,2005,48(6):503-514.
  • 6曹煜红,刘卫华.轨枕生产噪声对工人健康影响的调查[J].工业卫生与职业病,2003,29(2):99-101. 被引量:20

二级参考文献6

共引文献82

同被引文献5

  • 1刘亚静,王志英,徐晓荣.某电厂职业病危害现状分析与评价[J].包头医学院学报,2006,22(2):142-143. 被引量:1
  • 2中华人民共和国卫生部.GBZ1-2010工业企业设计卫生标准[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.
  • 3中华人民共和国卫生部.GBZ2.1-2007工作场所有害因素职业接触限值第1部分:化学有害因素[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.
  • 4中华人民共和国卫生部.GBZ/T 197-2007建设项目职业病危害控制效果评价技术导则[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.
  • 5中华人民共和国卫生部.GBZ2.2-2007工作场所有害因素职业接触限值第2部分:物理因素[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部