期刊文献+

引入管理者要素的企业生产模型 被引量:2

A New Production Model with Managerial Worker
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以新制度经济学家提出的交易费用概念为出发点,明确引入管理者要素构建的生产者努力函数对传统生产模型进行了修正。新模型中生产者直接参与生产,而管理者通过影响生产者的努力系数间接参与生产过程。本文探讨了均衡条件下企业对生产者、管理者需求弹性的变化规律,一是劳动者需求价格弹性仅受企业内相对工资水平与生产技术的影响,劳动者绝对工资数量的多寡、产品价格的高低都不起作用;二是企业对劳动力的需求交叉弹性为负数,这意味着新模型中的生产者与管理者要素是互补品而非替代品。 Traditional Economics has long ignored the fact that different types of labors may affect the output of a finn. Based on the core conception of transaction cost invented by New Institutional Economics, this paper constructs a new effort function and modifies the traditional production model by implicitly introducing one type of labor input- managerial worker. In the new model, productive worker is engaged in the production directly, while the managerial worker contributes to production by influencing the effort of productive worker, This paper examines the properties of effort function and new production function. In equilibrium, we further analyze the demand for labor (including productive worker and managerial worker ) with the tool of demand elasticity. We find out that (1) the price elasticity of demand for labor is dependent on relative wage level and techniques, but independent of absolute wage level and the price of product; (2) the cross elasticity of demand is negative, which implies that productive worker and managerial worker are complementary goods, instead of substitute goods.
作者 毕泗锋
出处 《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第11期83-90,共8页 Finance & Economics
关键词 生产者 管理者 生产函数 劳动需求弹性 Productive Worker Managerial Worker Effort function Production Function Elasticity of Demand for Labor
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1哈尔·瓦里安.微观经济学(高级)第三版[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1997.
  • 2Bazel Yoram. “An Economic Analysis of Slavery.” Journal of Law and Economics, . 1977, 17, no. I.
  • 3Goase Ronald “The Nature of The finn.” In Goase 1988, The frrm, The Market and The Law, 33 - 55. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1937.

同被引文献44

  • 1薄文广.外部性与产业增长——来自中国省级面板数据的研究[J].中国工业经济,2007(1):37-44. 被引量:151
  • 2李小平,朱钟棣.国际贸易、R&D溢出和生产率增长[J].经济研究,2006,41(2):31-43. 被引量:472
  • 3吴延兵.R&D与生产率——基于中国制造业的实证研究[J].经济研究,2006,41(11):60-71. 被引量:402
  • 4Solow R M. Technical change and the aggregate produc- tion function[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1957, 39:312-320.
  • 5Solow R M. Competitive valuation in a dynamic input-out- put system[J]. Econometrica, 1959,27(1):30-53.
  • 6Phelps E S, The new view of investment: A neoclassical analysis[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1962, 6(4):548- 567.
  • 7Intriligator M D. Embodied technical change and produc- tivity in the United States 1929-1958[J]. Review of Economies and Statistics,1965,2:65-70.
  • 8Nelson R R. Aggregate production functions and medium- range growth projections[J]. American Economic Review, 1964,9:575-606.
  • 9Felipe J. Total factor productivity growth in East Asia: A critical survey[J]. Journal of Development Studies, 1997,35 (4): 1-41.
  • 10Sharma S C, Sylwester K, Margono H. Decomposition of total factor productivity growth in US states[J]. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2007,47:215-241.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部