对“法官思维”的反思——以法官书写的经验为背景

Reconsidering on the Judging’s Thinking——On A Background of the Judges’Judicial Experience

法官思维是法律思维的一种形式,是法官根据法律进行判断的过程。近年,随着一些学者型法官的涌现,法官对审判活动的理论总结逐渐见诸报刊书籍。这种对审判经验的理论梳理,为法学研究提供了很好的经验资料。过去,我们认为法律解释学是对司法活动的概括与总结,但这只是一个表象问题,从纵深的研究对象来看,法律解释学实质上也是对法律人思想的反思。某一学科之所以被称为学术就在于其对已经思考的问题具有反思能力。我国法官应进一步明确克制、谦抑司法意识形态,应进一步强化理性思维的成分,从而深化对新的法律方法论的学习与研究。

The judge＇ s thinking is a kind of legal thinking and a process in which the judge makes the judgment according to the law. Recently, along with some scholar judge＇ s emergence, the judges＇ summarizing of judicial activities gradually appear in various newspapers and books. The experience theorized by the judges has provided the very good experience material for the legal science research. In the past, we thought the research of legal interpreting is a summary to the judicial activities, but this is only a superficial phenomenon. In the depth, the legal interpreting is also a reconsidering to the legal person＇ s thinking. The reason that some disciplines are called academics lays in the reconsidering - ability to the question. Judges in our country should further be clear about the restraint, modest and restrained judicature ideology, further strengthen the rational thinking, and thus we can deepen to the new legal methodology study and the research