期刊文献+

透视合作性学习的互动过程——对话行为及分析述评 被引量:1

Insight Interaction Processes During Cooperative Learning——Review on Dialogue Behavior and Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 合作性学习的互动过程经由"对话"而实现,对话是洞察其过程特征的重要窗口。文章概览教育心理学领域新近合作性学习研究(包括团队学习、同伴互动、小组学习等),从着眼互动过程出发,归纳出有关对话类型的描述与界定;对话行为的具体指标及相关分析框架等。为更好地理解相互促进与高效互动的学习过程或诊断合作低效与阻滞原因以及启示,同时为推动微观视角的过程探索以及为建构通用性对话分析框架等提供参考。 Usually interaction process in cooperation is realized by dialogue. Dialogue is an very important window to know about the characteristics of learning process. This paper generalized newly researches about cooperative learning (including team learning, peer interaction, group learning, etc. ), and concluded main description and definition about types of dialogue, main indexes of dialogue behavior and its'analysis basing on attention on interaction process. Doing so was in order to understand better about mutual enhancement, efficient interaction, or diagnosing ineffective cooperation, and to help micro-explore into interation-process during learning, and construct general dialogue analysis framework.
作者 彭杜宏
出处 《教育科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期55-60,共6页 Education Science
关键词 合作性学习 对话类型 话语指标 分析框架 cooperative learning types of dialogue indexes of dialogue behavior framework of Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Christoph, J. , & Nystrand, M. Taking risks, negotiating relationships: One teacher's transition towards a dialogic classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 2001, 36(2), 249-286.
  • 2Bakhtin, M. M. The dialogic imagination. Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Hoquist, Trans. ). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 1981.
  • 3Webb, N. M. Task related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1991, 22: 366-389.
  • 4Gillies, R. M. The Behaviors, Interactions, and Perceptions of Journal High School Students During Small-Group Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003, 95( 1 ) : 137-147.
  • 5汪航.合作学习认知研究综述[J].心理科学,2004,27(2):438-440. 被引量:26
  • 6Blatchford P, Ed Baines, Rubie-Davies C, Bassett P, Chowne A. The effect of New Approach to Group Work on Pupil-Pupil and Teacher-Pupil Interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology[J], 2006, 98( 4), 750-765.
  • 7Schellens T. , Valcke M. Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Computers in Human Behavior, 2005, 21: 957-975.
  • 8Asterhan C. S. C. , Schwarz B. B. The Effects of Monological and Dialogical Argumentation on Concept Learning in Evolutionary Theory, Journal of Educational Psychology , 2007, 99(3), 626-639.
  • 9Leitao, S. The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 2000, 43, 332-360.
  • 10Craig, S. D. , Sullins, J. ,Witherspoon, A. , & Gholson, B. (in press). The deep-level reasoning questions effect: The role of dialog and deep-level reasoning questions during vicarious learning. Cognition and Instruction.

二级参考文献23

  • 1Alexopoulou, E., & Driver,R. Small-group discussion in physics:Peer interaction modes in pairs mad fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1996,33 (10) : 1099 - 1114.
  • 2Pirolli, P , & Reeker, M. Learning strategies and transfer in the domain of programming. Cognition and Instruction, 1994, 12 ( 3 ) :235 - 275.
  • 3Kneser, C , & Ploetzner, R. Collaboration on the basis of complementary.domain knowledge:Observed dialogue structures and their relatioh to learning success. Learning and Instruction, 2001,11:53-83 .
  • 4Stasser, G ,Taylor, L A , & Hanna, C. Information sampling in structured mad unstructured discussions of three-and six-person groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989,57( 1 ) :67 - 78.
  • 5Anderson, J R. The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University press, 1983.
  • 6Lave, Jean, & Wenger, Etienne. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral articipation ( Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1991.
  • 7Palincsar, A S. Perspectives on teaching and learning. Annua Review of Psychology, 1998,49 : 345 - 375.
  • 8Fiore, S M. Problem space and problem solving failure: Cognitive mechanisms in the explanation of process loss in group problem solving, doctoral dissertation, university of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh:PA, 2000.
  • 9Azmitia, M , & Crowley, K. The rhythms of scientific thinking: A study of collaboration in anearthquake microworld. In K. Crowley &C D Schum & T Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications for everyday, classroom, and professional settings. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum. 2001 : 47 - 77.
  • 10Voss, J F. On the representation of problems: An informationprocessing approach to foreign policy decision making. In D A Sylvan & J F. Voss(Eds. ), Problem representation in foreign policy decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 : 8 -25.

共引文献25

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部