摘要
普惠制在GATT/WTO框架内的法律地位由GATT1971年的"豁免决定"和1979年的"授权条款"予以确立。因这两项法律文件缺乏约束性条款且无争端解决办法,为GSP在GATT/WTO框架内的推行所引发的法律争议埋下隐患。"印度诉欧盟关税优惠案"折射出的普惠制法律困境主要有:GSP项目的可诉性,"授权条款"与最惠国待遇原则的关系,GSP法律文件中"普遍的"、"非互惠"和"非歧视"要求与发达国家"有差别"、"有条件"地实施GSP之间的矛盾。
The legal status of GSP within GATT/WTO was established by the Decision of 1971 and the Enabling Clause of 1979. Whereas the absence of provision of obligation and dispute settlement in these two legal documents had resulted in legal disputes arising in enforcing GSP program within GAT/WTO. BY analyzing the WTO case ＂EC-Conditions for the Granting TariffPreferences to Developing Countries＂, this article discuss： the application of WTO rules to GSP; the relation between Enabling Clause aad MFN; the difference between ＂generalized＂ ,＂non-discriminatory＂, ＂non-reciprocal＂ in GSP legal documents and ＂discrimination＂, ＂conditionality＂ in GSP programs enforced by developed countries; the impact of GSP ease and corresponding tactics of developing countries.
出处
《上海商学院学报》
2008年第1期31-34,55,共5页
Business Economic Review
关键词
GSP非歧视
非互惠
有条件
GSP, non-discriminatory, non-reciprocal, conditionality
