司法赔偿确认程序存在的问题及对策

Problems Lying in the Affirmation Procedure of Judicatory Compensation and Their Countermeasures

在我国《国家赔偿法》中,确认程序是赔偿请求人获得司法赔偿的必经程序,然而由于现行的司法赔偿的确认程序存在着主体中立性不足、确认期限缺省、确认标准模糊、救济途径单一等诸多不足,使得确认程序遭致广泛的批评。对待确认程序的理性态度是揭示出其生成的宪政体制因素,并以此为基础将现行司法赔偿确认程序设计成可选择的程序,并在人大中设立最终处理机关。

With the Chinese State Compensation Law, a state organ＇s affirmation of it＇s illegal actions is the indispensable process to get the state compensation, but the current affirmation procedure is widely criticized for many faults,such as the shortage of corpus neutral, the lacking of confirmation term, the faintness of confirmation standard and the single relief path. The rational attitude to treat the confirmation procedure is to form the constitution system and to take this as the foundation to design the current judicatory compensation procedure as alternative procedure and establish the terminal operation organization in the People＇s Congress institution.