大学生思维方式与应对方式的关系研究

Relationship Between Thinking Style and Coping Style in University Students

运用思维方式问卷和应对方式问卷对663名大学生进行测试,旨在从文化视角探讨大学生思维方式的特点及其与应对方式的关系。结果表明:(1)大学生思维方式在专业、地域、年级等人口统计变量上存在显著差异:文科生思维的整体性显著高于理工科和艺术类;南方人思维的变化性显著高于北方人;大二学生思维的整体性显著高于大一和大三,大一思维的变化性显著高于大四年级。(2)思维方式对应对方式具有显著的预测作用。其中,协变性对积极应对正向作用显著、对消极应对中的自责和合理化负向作用显著;矛盾性对积极应对负向作用显著、对消极应对正向作用显著。思维的整体性和变化性针对性较强:整体性有助于解决问题的积极应对,变化性可有效避免自责、幻想、合理化的消极应对方式。

To explore the relationship between thinking style and coping style in university students from the perspective of culture. 663 university students were investigated. The results indicated that （1） There were significant difference among demographic datum, such as major, living area and grade. The liberal students were higher than science, engineering and arts ones on holistic thinking; The south students were higher than the north ones on change thinking; The students of grade two were obviously higher than the students of grade one and grade three on holistic thinking, the students of grade one were higher than the ones of grade four on change thinking. （2）Multiple regression analysis revealed that thinking style could predict coping style significantly： The covariant thinking had positive effect on active coping style, but a negative one on self- accusation and rationalization of passive coping style, and contradiction thinking had negative effect on active coping style, but a positive one on passive coping style. The holistic and change thinking had a strong objectivity： holistic thinking had positive effect on solve problem of active coping style, change thinking had a negative one on self-accusation, illusion and rationalization of passive coping style.