期刊文献+

从学习者角度辨析语言简写作用

下载PDF
导出
摘要 在对南京某高校152名非英语专业二年级学生进行问卷调查和对其中12名学生进行回溯性访谈的基础上,从学习者角度分析了语言简写的利与弊。其利主要在于词汇层面上,其弊主要在于句法层面上。但从长远来看,简写可能会降低语言学习的价值。通过这项研究,帮助材料编写者决定哪些阅读材料需要改写,帮助英语教师在教学过程中平衡教学内容,并根据教学目的合理安排阅读材料。
作者 郝义侠
出处 《重庆工学院学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第10期139-142,共4页 Journal of Chongqing Institute of Technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1[1]Kmshen S D.We acquire vocabulary and spelling by read-ing[J].The Modem Language Journal,1989(73):440-464.
  • 2[3]Peter Garrett & Terry Shortall.Learners' evaluations of teacher-fronted and student-centred classroom activities[J].Language Teaching Research,2002(6,1):25-57.
  • 3[4]Barkuizen G.Discovering learners' perceptions of ESL classroom teaching/learning activities in a South African context[J].TESOL Quarterly,1998(32):85-108.
  • 4[5]Leow R P.To simplify or not to simplify[J].Studies in Second Language Acquisition,1993(15):333-355.
  • 5[6]Honeyifield J.Simplification[J].TFSOL Quarterly,1977(11):431-440.
  • 6[7]West M.Criteria in the selection of simplified reading books[J].English Language Teaching,1964(18,4):146-153.
  • 7[8]Lotheringtom-Woloszyn,H.Do simplified texts simplify lan-guage comprension for KSL learners[C]//Tickoo M L.Simplification:Theory and application:Anthology series 31.Singapore:SEAMEO Regional Language Centre,1993:451-476.
  • 8[9]Hao Yixia.The Effects of linguistic simplification on read-ing comprehension for Chinese tertiary EFL learners[A].Proceedings of The 2006 International Symposium on Ap-pried Linguistics and Language Teaching[C].The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,2007:702-708.
  • 9[10]Hatch E.Simplified input and second language acquisition[C]//Anderson R W.Pidginizafion and creolizaiton as lan-guage acquisition.Rowley,MA:Newbury House,1983:64-86.
  • 10[11]Yano Y,Long M H,Ross S.The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension[J].Language Learning,1994(44):189-219.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部