论国际法院判决在美国的执行——以涉及《领事关系公约》的判决为重点被引量：1

Domestic Enforcement of ICJ's Judgments in US

导出

摘要美国国内对执行国际法院判决存在"国际主义观点"、"国家主义观点"和"折衷观点"等不同的看法。尽管美国政府出于现实原因,敦促国内法院遵守国际法院的判决,但美国最高法院对于在国内直接执行国际法院判决持否定态度。国际法院判决在美国的执行不力,凸现出国际法院的现有执行机制的不足,也反映了美国反对国际法在其国内法律体制中直接适用的倾向。 In the last years, domestic enforcement of ICJ＇ s judgments in United States attracts significant attention in international society. There are three standpoints to deal with this affair： Internationalism position, Nationalism position and Medial position. The Supreme Court of U.S. rejected the direct enforceability of ICJ＇ s judgments, regardless of the effort of U. S. ＇ government urging courts to enforce. Non - enforceability of ICJ＇ s judgments expose the shortages in the enforcing mechanism, and reflect the trend that resist the direct application of international law in U. S＇ legal system.

作者陈卫东管斌斌

机构地区对外经济贸易大学法学院

出处《当代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期138-143,共6页 Contemporary Law Review

基金 2004年国家社科基金项目重点项目

关键词国际法院《领事关系公约》美国最高法院麦德林案 ICJ Convention on Consular Relations Supreme Court of the US Medellin Case

分类号 D99 [政治法律—国际法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1John R. Crook. Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law: U. S Government Supports Supreme Court Review of Texas Decision [ J ]. American Journal of International Law. Vol. 101 (2007) : 480 -483.
2Michael P. Van Alstine. The Death of Good Faith in Treaty Jurisprudence and a Call for Resurrection [ J ]. Vol. 93 (2005). Georgetown Law Journal : 1885 - 1945.
3Death Penalty Information Center, Foreign Nationals and the Death Penalty in the United States,网址www. deathpenahyinfo. org.
4www. deathpenahyinfo. org.2008年7月28日访问.
5Case Concerning Arena and Other Mexican Nationals ( Mexico v. United States) , Provisional Measures, 2003 I. C. J ( Feb 5 ).
6Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals ( Mexico v United States), 2004 I. C. J( Judgment Mar 31 ), paras. 49 - 153.
7Brief of Former United States Diplomats, Foreign Sovereigns, the American Bar Association, International Law Experts as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner, Medellin v. Dretke, 125 S. Ct. 2088 (No. 04-5928).
86 Brief for Professors of International Law, Federal Jurisdiction and the Foreign Relations Law of the United States as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent, Medellin v. Dretke, 125 S. Ct. 2088 (No. 04-5928), at8-20.
9Memorandum for the Attorney General, "Compliance with the Decision of the International Court of Justice in Avena" ( Feb 28, 2005), at http: //brownwelsh. com/Archive/2005 -03 -10_ Avena_ compliance. pdf.
10Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, 126 S. Ct. 2669, (2006).