期刊文献+

企业IT系统应用决策的博弈分析及实证研究 被引量:2

Enterprise IT Application Decisions Game Analysis and Empirical Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现有文献很少基于企业间的博弈来研究企业IT系统应用决策问题。本文首先构建博弈论模型证明了企业IT采用层次、实施投入水平分别为决策变量的情况下,两阶段博弈纯纳什均衡的存在性和唯一性,进而求出IT采用层次和预算同时决策变量条件下,n个企业三阶段博弈纯纳什均衡解,分析了纳什均衡状态时,企业初始因素、IT系统采用层次、实施投入水平及IT应用绩效之间的相互关系,同时以重庆市相关企业为样本的两阶段问卷数据,对理论分析的结果进行实证研究,结果表明:采用动因和实施投入水平显著正相关,实施投入水平与IT应用绩效显著正相关,采用层次与实施投入水平负相关,采用动因与应用绩效显著负相关。 There are few papers to study IT application decisions based on game theory. This study proves existence and uniqueness of the pure-- strategic Nash Equilibrium of n firms' following three-- stage game: in the first stage, the enterprise decides IT adoption level Mi ; in the second Stage, the enterprise decides the level of resources allocated to IT implementation ki ; in the last stage, the enterprise decides its own product quantity qi , to participate in Cournot product quantity competition. Then at the state of Nash Equi- librium the relevant factors relationship is analyzed. The results show that : the adoption motivation on the level of resources allocated to IT implementation, the level of resources allocated to IT implementation on IT application performance exist positive effect significantly ; the adoption level on the level of resources allocated to IT implementation, the adoption motivation on IT application performance exist nega- tive effect significantly.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 2008年第5期182-192,共11页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70272043)
关键词 纳什均衡 企业先天条件 采用层次 实施投入水平 IT应用绩效 pure--strategic Nash Equilibrium solution the enterprise precondition the adoption motiva-tion the adoption level the level of resources allocated to IT implementation IT application performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献22

  • 1卢向华.信息技术评价理论的研究与发展[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(2):314-320. 被引量:11
  • 2陈文波,黄丽华.组织信息技术采纳的影响因素研究述评[J].软科学,2006,20(3):1-4. 被引量:32
  • 3杨青.基于能力的BPiI印战略匹配研究[D].上海:复旦大学管理学院,2001.
  • 4罗宾斯 P 斯帝芬.管理学[M].人民大学出版社,1998..
  • 5小瑞芒德·麦克劳德,乔治·谢尔/张成洪译.管理信息系统(第8版)[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2002.266-267.
  • 6E.Brynjolfsson.The productivity paradox of information technology:review and assessment[J].Communications of ACM,1993.
  • 7Kaplan RS,Norton DP.The Balanced Scorecard- Measures That Drive Performance[J].Harvard Business Review.1992(1- 2):71- 79.
  • 8PRTM.SCOR- model[EB/OL].http://www.supply- chain.org/slides/SCOR5.0OverviewBooklet.pdf.2002,10.
  • 9Albert Boonstra.Structure and Analysis of IS Decision-Making.European Journal of Information Systems,2003,12(3)
  • 10Sabherwal R,King W R.An Empirical Taxonomy of the Decision-Making Process Concerning Strategic Applications of Information Systems.Journal of Management Information Systems,1995,11(4)

共引文献86

同被引文献22

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部