主流范式的危机:我国食品安全治理模式的反思与重整

The Crisis of Mainstream Paradigm——Introspection and Reforming of China's Food Safety Regulation

在我国当前理论研究与实践改革中对食品安全治理形成了以"改善政府监管"为路径依赖的主流范式。这种范式是以管制经济学为理论基础的。伴随着西方芝加哥学派的勃兴,管制经济学理论自二十世纪后半叶遭到了重大批判,以此为基石构建的我国食品安全治理主流范式也面临着政府替代还是市场修正、公共利益还是部门利益、政府万能还是政府有限的逻辑性、主导性、主体性危机。应当以管制为逻辑起点,以信誉机制为先导,以不完备法律理论下剩余立法权与执法权的优化分配为启迪,在食品安全中构建市场先行,辅之以政府、第三部门、法庭与私人多元参与的合作化治理模式。

In the field of china＇ s food market, it is a kind of mainstream paradigm that either academy or government put the emphases on how to ameliorate the regulation of government. The mainstream paradigm bases on the regulation economics theory. With the rise of Chicago school, this theory met with fatal criticism. So the mainstream paradigm which bases on the theory also met with the same criticisms, which are logic crisis of ＂government replacement or market mending＂, dominant crisis of ＂public benefit or private benefit＂, and main body crisis of ＂almighty government or limited government＂. We should look regulation as logic jumping-off point, and base China＇ s food safety control system on credit and imperfect theory. We ought to make the market first, and realize the mechanism that government, the third department, court and individual cooperate to regulate food market.