期刊文献+

无生长追赶小于胎龄儿胰岛素敏感性及垂体-甲状腺轴变化的研究 被引量:4

Altered insulin sensitivity and pituitary-thyroid axis in children born small for gestational age without catch-up growth
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨无生长追赶小于胎龄儿(SGA)胰岛素敏感性及垂体-甲状腺轴的变化。方法选择近3年中山大学附属第一医院儿科内分泌专科门诊的青春前期生长迟缓儿童,按性别、年龄、体块指数(BMI)匹配分为两组,即无生长追赶SGA组和矮小适于胎龄儿组(AGA),各24例进行病例对照研究。两组均检测空腹血糖、血清胰岛素及血清TSH、T3、T4,并计算血糖/胰岛素比值(G/I比值)、胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)和胰岛β细胞功能(HOMA%)。结果SGA组空腹血糖与AGA组比较无显著性差异,但空腹胰岛素、HOMA-IR、HOMA%均显著高于AGA组(8.0±6.2vs4.4±2.8mU/L,1.8±1.4vs1.0±0.7和183.0±145.9vs70.8±43.6,P均<0.05);SGA组HOMA-IR>3人数显著高于AGA组(7/24vs1/24,P<0.05);G/I比值显著低于AGA组(17.8±15.1vs33.2±28.9,P<0.05)。SGA组血清TSH显著高于AGA组(2.9±0.8vs1.9±0.9mU/L,P<0.01),而血清T3、T4两组比较差异无统计学意义。SGA血清胰岛素、HOMA-IR与出生体重SDS呈负相关(r=-0.547和-0.482,P均<0.05);SGA血清TSH与出生身长SDS呈负相关(r=-0.571,P<0.01)。结论无生长追赶SGA存在胰岛素抵抗和垂体-甲状腺轴的改变,无生长追赶SGA需要长期随访和早期干预,以预防或延缓代谢综合征发生。 Objective To study the change of insulin sensitivity and pituitary-thyroid axis in children born small for gestational age (SGA) without catch-up growth. Methods Twenty-four prepubertal SGA children without catch-up growth and 24 short children horn appropriate for gestational age ( AGA ), matched for sex, age, body mass index ( BMI ), were enrolled in this case-control study. All children were from our pediatric endocrine clinic during the recent three years. Blood glucose, serum insulin ,TSH ,T3 and T4 were measured in the fasting state in both groups. The ratio of fasting glucose/insulin ( G/I ratio ), homeostasis assessment model for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and islet 13 cell function ( HOMA% ) were calculated. Results There was no significant difference in the fasting blood glucose between SGA and AGA group. However, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR and HOMA% in SGA group were significantly higher than those in AGA group (8.0±6.2 vs 4.4±2.8 mU/L,1.8 ±1.4 vs 1.0±0.7 and 183.0±145.9 vs 70. 8 ±43.6,all P 〈0.05);The number of patients with HOMA-IR 〉 3 in SGA was significantly more than that of the AGA group ( 7/24 vs 1/24, P 〈 0. 05 ) ; G/I ratio was significantly lower than that of the AGA group ( 17.8 ± 15.1 vs 33.2 ± 28. 9, P 〈 0. 05 ). The levels of serum TSH were significantly higher in the SGA than those in the AGA group ( 2. 9 ± 0. 8 vs 1.9 ± 0. 9 mU/L P 〈 0. 01 ) ,whereas serum T3 and T4 were similar in both groups. There was a negative correlation between fasting insulin or HOMA-IR and birth weight SDS in SGA children ( r = - 0. 547 and - 0. 482, all P 〈 0. 05 ) ; There was a negative cor-relation between serum TSH and birth length SDS in SGA children. ( r = - 0. 571, P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion Insulin resistance and minor alteration of pituitary-thyroid axis occur in children born SGA without catch-up growth, suggesting the needs of long term follow-up and early intervention in preven-ting or delaying the development of metabolic syndrome.
出处 《中国实用儿科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期778-781,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Pediatrics
关键词 小于胎龄儿 无生长追赶 胰岛素敏感性 垂体-甲状腺轴 Small for gestational age No catch-up growth Insulin sensitivity Pituitary-thyroid axis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Gluckman PD, Harding JE. The physiology and pathophysiology of intrauterine growth retardation [ J ]. Horm Res. 1997,48 Suppl 1:11-16.
  • 2Fowden AL, Forhead AJ. Endocrine mechanisms of intrauterine programming[ J ]. Reproduction. 2004,127 ( 5 ) :515-26.
  • 3Levy-Marchal C, Czemichow P. Small for gestational age and the metabolic syndrome: which mechanism is suggested by epidemiological and clinical studies? [ J]. Horm Res. 2006,65 Suppl 3 : 123-130.
  • 4Hak AE, Pols HA, Visser TJ. Subclinical hypothyroidism is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction in elderly women: the Rotterdam Study [ J ]. Ann Intern Med. 2000,15 ; 132 (4) :270-278.
  • 5刘占利,梁琨,贺湘英,朱高红,王柏岺,曾彬,莫亚雄.胎儿生长迟缓与新生儿胰岛素敏感性变化的相关性[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2006,21(5):357-359. 被引量:6
  • 6Rabasa-Lhoret R, Laville M. How to measure insulin sensitivity in clinical practice? [ J ]. Diabetes Metab. 2001,27 ( 2 Pt 2 ) : 201 - 208.
  • 7Geremia C, Cianfarani S. Laboratory tests and measurements in children born small for gestational age (SGA) [ J ]. Clin Chim Acta. 2006.364 ( 1-2 ) : 113-123.
  • 8Caro JF. Clinical review 26 : Insulin resistance in obese and non- obese man[ J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991,73 (4) :691-695.
  • 9Haffner SM, Mykkanen L, Festa A, et al. Insulin-resistant predia-betic subjects have more atherogenic risk factors than insulinsensitive prediabetic subjects: implications for preventing coronary heart disease during the prediabetic state [ J ]. Circulation 2000,101 (9) :975-980.
  • 10Gungor N, Saad R, Janosky J, et al. Validation of surrogate estimates of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in children and adolescents [ J ]. J Pediatr. 2004,144 ( 1 ) :47 -55.

二级参考文献8

  • 1李光伟,Step.,L.检测人群胰岛素敏感性的一项新指数[J].中华内科杂志,1993,32(10):656-660. 被引量:2125
  • 2胡亚美,江载芳.诸福棠实用儿科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:311.
  • 3Phenekos C.Influence of fetal body weight on metabolic complications in adults life:review of the evidence[J].J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab,2001,14 Suppl 5:1361-1363.
  • 4Veening MA,Van Weissenbruch MM,Delemarre-Van De Waal HA.Glucose tolerance,insulin sensitivity,and insulin secretion in children born small for gestational age[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2002,87(10):4657-4661.
  • 5Haffner SM,Gonzalez C,Miettinen H,et al.A prospective analysis of the Homa model.The Mexico City Diabetes Study[J].Diabetse Care,1996,19:1138-1141.
  • 6Matthews DR,Hosker JP,Rudenski AS,et al.Homeostasis model assessment:insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man[J].Diabetologia,1985,28:412-419.
  • 7Jaquet D,Czemichow P.Bom small for gestational age:increased risk of type 2 diabetes,hypertension and hyperlipidaemia in adulthood[J].Horm Res,2003,59:1-6.
  • 8Rodrigo A,Bazaes MD,Teresa E,et al.Glucose and lipid metabolism in small-for-gestational-age infants at 48 hours of age[J].Am J Pediatr,2003,11(4):804-809.

共引文献5

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部