期刊文献+

多偏好逻辑GMPL

GMPL Logic of Kinds of Preferences
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对缺乏多类型偏好共存的偏好逻辑系统的现状,MPL(logic of many kinds of preference)被构造为一种能够表示和推理四类型偏好的偏好逻辑,但是MPL的语义基于全前序偏好结构,因而不能表示不完全偏好.为此,提出了偏好逻辑GMPL(a generalized edition of MPL).此外,通过常见逻辑偏好的GMPL重写表明GMPL较强的表达能力和实际应用前景.并提出一种将GMPL的SAT问题归结为命题逻辑的SAT问题的方法. Because of the absence of a whole logic to represent and reason various kinds of preferences, MPL (logic of many kinds of preference) is presently constructed to fill the gap. But, the semantics of MPL is based on the complete pre-order, so incomplete preferences cannot be expressed in it. In this paper, GMPL (a generalized edition of MPL) is introduced to supply the gap. In addition, the expressive power of GMPL is showed by rewriting several familiar logical preferences. Moreover, a decision procedure is introduced to reduce SAT problem of GMPL into that of propositional logic.
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第11期2968-2978,共11页 Journal of Software
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.60773107 (国家自然科学基金)
关键词 偏好表示 偏好逻辑 偏好推理 preference representation preference logic preference reasoning
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1van Benthem J, van Otterloo S, Roy O. Preference logic, conditionals and solution concepts in games. In: Lagerlund H, Lindstrom S, Sliwinski R, eds. Modality Matters: Twenty-Five Essays in Honour of Krister Segerberg. Uppsala: University of Uppsala, 2006.61-76.
  • 2Brewka G. A rank based description language for qualitative preferences. In: Saitta L, ed. Proc. of the 16th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Valencia: IOS Press, 2004. 303-307.
  • 3Lang J. Logic preference representation and combinatorial vote. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2004,42(1-3): 37-71.
  • 4Coste-Marquis S, Lang J, Liberatore P, Marquis P. Expressive power and succinctness of propositional languages for preference representation. In: Dubois D, Welty C, Williams MA, eds. Proc. of the 9th Int'l Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2004). Menlo Park: AAAI Press, 2004. 203-212.
  • 5Doyle J, Wellman M. Representing preferences as ceteris paribus comparatives. In: Hanks S, Russel S, Wellman M, eds. Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symp. on Decision-Theoretic Planning. Menlo Park: AAAI Press, 1994. 69-75.
  • 6Doyle J. Prospects for preferences. Computational Intelligence, 2004,20(2): 111-136.
  • 7Ozturk M, Tsoukias A, Vincke P. Preference modelling. In: Ehrgott M, Greco S, Figueira J, eds. State of the Art in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2005.27-72.
  • 8Kikuti D, Cozman FG, de Campos CP. Partially ordered preferences in decision trees: computing strategies with imprecision in probabilities. In: Brafman R, Junker U, eds. Proc. of Multidisciplinary IJCAI-05 Workshop on Advances in Preference Handling. Edinburgh, 2005. 118-123. http://wikix.ilog.fr/wiki/bin/view/Preference 05/WsProceedings
  • 9Hansson SO. Preference Logic in Handbook of Philosophical Logic. 2nd ed,, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
  • 10von Wright GH. The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision, 1972,3(2): 140-169.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部