期刊文献+

《刑法》罪名确定机制的演进与革新——由全国人大常委会确定《刑法》罪名的建议 被引量:1

The Development and Reform of the Charge Creation Mechanism of the Criminal Law——the Suggestion about Creating the Charges of the Criminal Law by the Standing Committee of the National People ’s Congress
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,《刑法》或《刑法修正案》出台后由最高人民法院、最高人民检察院以司法解释形式确定新规定犯罪之称谓的传统罪名确定机制存在诸多弊端,如易背离立法本意、效率低下等。以与时俱进之理念革新现行《刑法》罪名确定机制势在必行,考虑我国刑事司法的实际状况,在经过与《刑法修正案》同步出台立法解释和在《刑法修正案》中直接规定罪名两个阶段的过渡后,最终将实现由最高立法机关在刑法典中直接规定罪名的理想目标。 The traditional charge creation mechanism is instituted through the judicial intebpretation issued by the Supreme People's Court and the People's Supreme People's Procuratorate after the amendment to the Criminal Law. Nowadays, the traditional charge creation mechanism has many defects such as deviating from the original ideas and low efficiency. Thus it is urgent to establish the new mechanism of making charges. Considering our country's criminal judicial situation, after the transitional tools of the judicial interpretation and the amendments of the Criminal Law, we are looking forward to the goals of creating charges of the criminal law by the supreme legislative body directly.
作者 房军
出处 《安徽警官职业学院学报》 2008年第5期37-38,61,共3页 Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
关键词 刑法 刑法修正案 罪名 立法建议 criminal Law amendment to the criminal law charge suggestion on legislation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献5

  • 1张文,刘艳红.罪名立法模式论要[J].中国法学,1999(4):121-131. 被引量:18
  • 2王勇.论罪名[J].中国法学,1988(3):81-86. 被引量:7
  • 3高铭暄.《新中国刑法学研究综述》[M].河南人民出版社,1986年版.第68页.
  • 4张灏.《中国刑法理论及实用》,三民书局,1980年版,第267页.
  • 5周治平.“罪数论”,蔡墩铭主编.《刑法总则论文选辑(下)》,台湾五南图书出版公司,1984年版,第677页.

共引文献10

同被引文献24

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部