条约解释方法在解决条约冲突中的运用被引量：19

The Application of Treaty Interpretation in Resolving Treaty Conflict

导出

摘要条约解释是国际法中的一项重要制度,通常用于澄清条约约文的含义。在国际法不成体系的背景下,条约解释也可以用来解决条约间的冲突。用于解决条约冲突的条约解释方法在实践中并不局限于《维也纳条约法公约》中所规定的内容,还包括其他一些具有国际习惯性质的方法。不过,由于国际法的法律规则之间缺乏明确的效力等级,条约解释方法在解决条约冲突方面的作用也受到一些限制。 Treaty Interpretation, with the purpose of clarifying the text, is an important legal institution and can be used for resolving treaty conflict. Indeed, means for resolving treaty conflict are not only provided in VCLT, but comprise some other customary methods. However, the effect of treaty interpretation in respect of resolving treaty conflict may be restrictive due to the lack of hierarchy in international legal rules.

作者廖诗评

机构地区北京师范大学法学院

出处《外交评论（外交学院学报）》 CSSCI 2008年第5期103-110,共8页 Foreign Affairs Review

基金作者主持的国家社科基金项目"国际法治与和谐世界构建研究"(项目批准号:08CFX053)的阶段性成果

关键词条约解释条约冲突国际法国际条约

分类号 D993.8 [政治法律—国际法学] F117 [经济管理—国际贸易]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1Ian Sinclair, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984, p. 114.
2C. Wilfred Janks, "The Conflict of Law-making Treaties", British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 30, 1953, p. 426.
3Ian Sinclair, TheVienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, p. 114.
4Guyora Binder, Treaty Conflicts and Political Contradiction: The Dialectic of Duplicity, London: Westport, 1988, p. 7.
5United Nations, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. I, 1964, p. 125.
6V. Czaplinski, G. Danilenko, "Conflict of Norms in International Law", Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 21, 1990, p.13.
7[比]约斯特·鲍威林.《国际公法规则之冲突:WTO法与其它国际法规则如何联系》,周忠海等译,北京:法律出版社.2005年,第198-199页.
8Ali Sadat-Akhavi, Methods of Resolving Conflicts between Treaties, Amsterdam: Nijhoff Publishers, 2003.
9Jan B. Mus, "Conflicts between Treaties in International Law", Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. 29, 1998, pp. 208-209.
10[比]约斯特·鲍威林.《国际公法规则之冲突:WTO法与其它国际法规则如何联系》,第210-217页.

二级参考文献39

1WT/DS54/R, WT/DS55/R, WT/DS59/R, WT/DS64/R,adopted on 23 July 1998,paras 14.29 - 14.36 and 14.97 - 14.99.
2Lorand Barlets, Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings, at Journat of World Trade 35(3), 2001 ,pp.508- 510.
3WT/DS22/AB/R, 21 February 1997, at p. 11.
4Draft Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, MTN.TNC/W/FA, 20 December 1991, p. T.3.
5BISD 36S/268,adopted 7 November 1989,para.3.
6BISD 36S/135,adopted 22 November 1989,para.1.3.
7BISD 36S/306,adopted 2 November 1989,para.1.3.
8WT/DS22,17 Octcber 1996.
9WT/DS21/5, 23 July 1999.
10See: Scott Little,"Pretininary Objections to Panel Requests and Terms of Reference:Panel and Appellate Body Rulings on the First Line of Defence in WID Dispute Settlement Proceedings ",at Journal of World Trade 35(4), 2001,p. 554.