期刊文献+

质疑胜诉权为民法上一项实在的权利——以诉讼时效届满为视角

Reconsideration on the Right of Winning the Lawsuit is an Actual Right in Civil Law——In the Perspective of Expiration of Limitation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 诉讼时效制度是民法学上的一项重要的制度,它的届满将引起民事权利的变动。然而不同立法例对诉讼时效的效力有着不同的规定。基于我国民事方面的相关立法,我国民法学界对此的通说是"胜诉权丧失模式"。然而,学者对胜诉权的详细论述却不多见。那么,首先面对的一个问题就是,胜诉权是否是一项实在的权利。本文将从以下思路展开论述。首先,探讨诉讼时效的届满与胜诉权的丧失;继而追溯胜诉权的来源及对其的批评;然后从权利自身对胜诉权的检讨;最后,重构诉讼时效效力。 The system of Limitation is important in civil law, whose expiration changes civil rights. How- ever, there are many different provisions in different legislative models. In accordance with civil legislation of china, the general doctrine is the model of losing the right to win, but few scholars have argued the rights to win. Therefore, whether the fight to win is a actual right. There are several sections to question it. The expiration of limitations and the loss of the fight to win are discussed, the resource of which is traced to and a critical atti- tude is taken. I try to reeonsiderate it, then reconstruct its validity. Finally, the conclusions will be come into.
出处 《吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 2008年第4期66-68,共3页 Journal Of Jilin Normal University:Humanities & Social Science Edition
基金 教育部社会科学重大攻关项目 项目编号:06JZD0011
关键词 胜诉权 实体意义上的诉权 诉讼时效届满 rights of winning a lawsuit lawsuit right in entity meaning expiration of Limitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]龙卫球.民法总则[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2002:601.
  • 2[6]潭兵.民事诉讼法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:63.
  • 3[9]周永坤.诉权法理论纲[M]//中国诉讼法学精萃.北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
  • 4[10]杨新宇.法理学导论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2002:49.
  • 5[11]顾培东.论诉权[M]//法学与经济学的探索.北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,1994.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部