期刊文献+

GDP方案治疗24例复发、耐药侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤临床分析 被引量:13

Efficacy of GDP Regimen(Gemcitabine,Dexamethasone,and Cisplatin) on Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma:A Report of 24 Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景与目的:复发、耐药侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(non-Hodgkin’slymphoma,NHL)的预后仍较差,寻找高效、低毒的挽救方案一直是研究的目标。吉西他滨单药治疗淋巴瘤有效,与顺铂联合对一些实体瘤有很好的疗效。本研究评价吉西他滨联合顺铂及地塞米松组成的GDP方案治疗复发、耐药侵袭性NHL的疗效及毒副反应。方法:24例复发或耐药的侵袭性NHL均具有可测量的病灶,均接受过至少一种方案化疗。GDP方案:吉西他滨1000mg/m2静脉滴注,d1,8;DDP25mg/m2静脉滴注,d1~3;地塞米松20~40mg静脉滴注,d1~3。每3周重复1次。按WHO疗效和不良反应评价标准进行疗效和不良反应评价。结果:24例患者共完成76个周期化疗,均可评价疗效和不良反应。完全缓解5例,部分缓解9例,8例稳定,2例进展。完全缓解率20.8%,总缓解率58.3%;B细胞NHL和T细胞NHL的缓解率分别为57.1%和60.0%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.889)。全组中位随访1.2年,总1年生存率41.7%,B细胞NHL和T细胞NHL的1年生存率分别为42.9%和40.0%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.986)。Ⅲ~Ⅳ度白细胞减少、血小板减少及血红蛋白减少的发生率分别为16.7%、37.5%及25.0%,非血液学不良反应较轻微。无治疗相关死亡。2例患者挽救化疗后进行了干细胞移植,干细胞动员效果未受影响。结论:GDP方案治疗复发、耐药侵袭性NHL是一个有效的、相对低毒的挽救方案,值得临床进一步研究。 BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE. The prognosis of relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) after front-line therapy remains poor. The development of more effective and less toxic salvage regimens remains a major challenge. Gemcitabine is effective in treating lymphoma and, when combined with cisplatin, is effective for some solid tumors. This study was to evaluate the efficacy of GDP regimen (gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin) on relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL, and observe the adverse events. METHODS. Patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL, measurable disease, and had received previously at least one chemotherapy regimen were enrolled and treated with GDP regimen (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8, dexamethasone 20-40 mg on Days 1-3, and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on Days 1-3) every 3 weeks. The efficacy and adverse events were evaluated according to the WHO criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients had received a total of 76 chemotherapy cycles, and were assessable for efficacy and adverse events. Five (20.8%) patients had complete response, 9 had partial response, 8 had stable disease, and 2 had progressive disease. The overall response rate (RR) was 58.3% for assessable patients; it was 57.1% for B- cell NHL patients and 60.0% for T-cell NHL patients (P=0.889). The median follow-up was 1.2 years. The 1-year overall survival rate was 41.7%; it was 42.9% in B-cell NHL patients and 40.0% in T-cell NHL patients (P=0.986). The occurrence rate was 37.5% for grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ leucopenia, 25.0% for thrombocytopenia, and 16.7% for anemia in all patients. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild. There was no treatment-related death. Two patients proceeded to stem cell transplantation after salvage chemotherapy and obtained sufficient stem cells. CONCLUSION: GDP regimen is an effective and relatively nontoxic salvage chemotherapy regimen for relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL.
出处 《癌症》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第11期1222-1225,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cancer
关键词 非霍奇金淋巴瘤/化学疗法 吉西他滨 挽救方案 复发 疗效 Non-Hodgkin' s lymphoma/chemotherapy Gemcitabine Salvage chemotherapy Recurrence Efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Fisher R I, Gaynor E R, Dahlberg S, et al. Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [J]. N Engl J Med, 1993,328(14) : 1002-1006.
  • 2Bouffard D Y, Momparler L F, Momparler R L. Comparison of antineoplastic activity of 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine and cytosine arabinoside against human myeloid and lymphoid leukemic cells [J]. Anticancer Drugs, 1991,2(1) :49-55.
  • 3Csoka K, Liliemark J,Larsson R, et al. Evaluation of the cytotoxic activity of gemcitabine in primary cultures of tumor cells from patients with hematologic or solid tumors [J]. Semin Oncol, 1995,22(4 Suppl 11) :47-53.
  • 4Peters G J, Bergman A M, Ruiz van Haperen V W, et al. Interaction between cisplatin and gemcitabine in vitro and in vivo [J]. Semin Oncol, 1995,22(4Suppl 11):72-79.
  • 5Bergman A M, Ruiz van Haperen V W, Veerman G, et al. Synergistic interaction between ciaplatin and gemcitabine in vitro [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 1996,2(3) :521-530.
  • 6Crump M, Baetz T, Couban S. Gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin in patients with recurrent or refractory aggressive histology B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma [J]. Cancer, 2004, 101 (8) : 1835-1842.
  • 7Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [J]. N Engl J Med, 1995,333(23):1540-1545.
  • 8Plunkett W, Huang P, Searcy C E, et al. Gemcitabine: preclinical pharmacology and mechanisms of action [J]. Semin Oncol, 1996,23(5 Suppl 10):3-15.
  • 9Fossa A, Santoro W, Hiddemann L, et al. Gemcitabine as a single in the treatment of relapsed or refractory aggressive non-nodgkin's lymphoma [J]. J Clin Oncol, 1999,17(12): 3786-3792.
  • 10马树东,盛信秀,罗荣城,李爱民.盐酸吉西他滨治疗复发性或难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2002,24(6):619-621. 被引量:36

二级参考文献11

  • 1周生余,石远凯,何小慧,张频,董梅,黄鼎智,杨建良,张长弓,刘鹏,杨晟,冯奉仪.DICE方案治疗复发或耐药中高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤[J].癌症,2005,24(4):465-469. 被引量:29
  • 2Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S, et al. Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimen for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [J]. N Engl J Med, 1993,328(14): 1002-1006.
  • 3Velasquez WS, Cabanillas F, Salvador P, et al. Effective salvage therapy for lymphoma with cisplatin in combination with high-dose Ara-C and dexamethasone (DHAP) [J]. Blood,1988,71 ( 1 ): 117-122.
  • 4Coleman M, Leonard J, Shuster MW, et al. DICE(dexamethasone, ifosfamide, cisplatine, etoposide) infusional chemotherapy for refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin'slymphoma (NHL) [J]. Eur J Haematol, 2001,64:41-45.
  • 5Wilder DD, Ogden JL, Jain VK, et al. A multicenter trial of infusional etoposide, doxorubicin, and vincristine with cyclophosphamide and prednisone (EPOCH) in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [J]. Clin Lymphoma, 2001,1 (4): 285-292.
  • 6Rodriguez MA, Cabanillas FC, Hagemeister FB, et al. A phase Ⅱ trial of mesna/ifosfamide, mitoxantrone and etoposide for refractory lymphomas [ J ]. Ann Oncol, 1995,6 (6): 609-611.
  • 7The international non-Hodgkin's lymphoma prognostic factors project. A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [J]. N Engl J Med, 1993,329(14):987-993
  • 8Mayer J, Vasova I, Koristek Z, et al. Ifosfamide- and etoposidebased chemotherapy as salve and mobilizing regimens for poorprognosis lymphoma [ J ]. Eur J Haematol Suppl, 2001,64: 21 -27.
  • 9Emmanouilides C, Lill M, Telatar M, et al. Mitoxantrone/ifosfamide/etoposide salvage regimen with rituximab for in vivo purging in patients with relapsed lymphoma [J]. Clin Lymphoma, 2002,3 (2): 111 - 116.
  • 10D. G. Savage,S. A. J. Rule,M. Tighe,T. J. Garrett,M. W. Oster,R. T. Lee,J. Ruiz,D. Heitjan,M. L. Keohan,M. Flamm,S. A. Johnson. Gemcitabine for relapsed or resistant lymphoma[J] 2000,Annals of Oncology(5):595~597

共引文献51

同被引文献90

引证文献13

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部