期刊文献+

高层转喻研究 被引量:28

High-level Metonymy Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 对于语法结构、间接言语行为和构式中的高层转喻,已有不少研究,但非常深奥难懂,观点又存在差异,本文目的在于引介、梳理转喻在这三领域中的最新研究成果和主要观点,涉及的主要概念:高层转喻、低层转喻、高层命题转喻和高层情景转喻等。 There have been some researches about high-level metonymy as cognitive mechanism in grammatical structures, indirect speech acts and linguistic constructions. But it is difficult to understand them as they have different perspectives sometimes. The purpose of this paper is to introduce and outline the new findings in the three areas. The main concepts involved are: high-level metonymy, low-level metonymy, high-level propositional metonymy, high-level situational metonymy and so on. It is believed that such phenomena can also be found in Chinese.
作者 陈香兰
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期14-18,22,共6页 Foreign Language Education
基金 中国博士后基金资助项目 项目编号:20070420267
关键词 高层转喻 语法转喻 高层情景转喻 间接言语行为 构式 high-level metonymy grammatical metonymy high-level situational metonymy indirect speech acts constructions
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Dik, Simon C. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Vol. 1 : The Structure of the Clause[ M ]. Dordrecht: Foris,1989.
  • 2Fillmore, Charles J. , Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O' Connor. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions : The case of let alone[ J]. Language,1988(64) : 501-538.
  • 3Goldberg, Adele E. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [ M ]. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  • 4Jackendoff, Ray. The Architecture of the Language Faculty[ M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press,1997.
  • 5Kovecses, Zoltan and Gunter Radden. Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view[ J ]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1998 (9-1) : 37-77.
  • 6Kovecses, Zoltan and Gunter Radden. Towards a theory of metonymy [ J]. In Panther, Klaus-Uwe. and Gunter Radden. (eds.)Metonymy in Language and Thought[ C]. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999 : 17-60.
  • 7Langacker, Ronald W. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar[ M ]. Berlin: Mouton de Gmyter, 1990.
  • 8Panther, Klaus-Uwe. & Linda Thomburg. A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation [ J ]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1998 ( 30 ) : 755- 769.
  • 9Panther, Klaus-Uwe. & Linda Thomburg. Coercion and metonymy: The interaction of constructional and lexical meaning [ A ]. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk ( eds. ). Cognitive Perspective on Language [ C ]. Frankfurt am Main : Peter Lang, 1999a :37-52.
  • 10Panther, Klaus-Uwe. & Linda Thomburg. The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian[ A]. In Panther, Klaus-Uwe. & Guuter Radden( eds. ). Metonymy in Language and Thought[ C ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999b :333-360.

二级参考文献34

  • 1徐赳赳.现代汉语联想回指分析[J].中国语文,2005(3):195-204. 被引量:40
  • 2王甦 汪圣安.认知心理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1996,2..
  • 3Bach, K. &. Harnish, R. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,1979.
  • 4Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • 5Gordon, David & Lakoff, George. Conversational postulates[A].In Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan(eds.). Speech Acts(Syntax and Semantics 3) [C]. New York: Academic Press, 1975 : 187-210.
  • 6Hernandez, L. P. & de Mendoza, F. J. R. Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2002(34) :259-284.
  • 7Lakoff,George. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things[M]. Chicago: IL: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 8Leech, Geoffrey. Principles of Pragmatics [M]. New York:Longman, 1983.
  • 9Levinson, Stephen. Pragmatics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • 10Morgan, Jerry L. Two types of convention in indirect speech acts[A]. In :Peter Cole, (ed.). Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 9: Pragmatics[C]. New York: Academic Press, 1978:261-280.

共引文献61

同被引文献355

引证文献28

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部