债权人行使代位权的效果归属

Ascription of Result of Enforcing of Creditor’s Subrogation

合同法对债权人行使代位权的效果未作规定,但最高人民法院的司法解释却扩充了合同法关于代位权效力的规定,由此引发了民法学界的种种争论。目前,关于代位权行使的效力,有入库规则说、平均分配说、优先受偿说等几种观点。行使代位权的债权人之债权可分为债权人在行使代位权之前的原有债权和债权人因行使代位权支出必要费用而享有的新债权两部分,对于原有债权和新债权,在不同情形下,可采取不同的清偿规则,从而使债权人行使代位权的效果归属动态化。

The Contract Law has not given any provision on the effect of the creditor carrying on the right of subrogation. But the judicial explanation of the Supreme People＇s Court complements the regulation on the effect of the subrogation fight regulated by the contract law. The complementation has been arousing disputes within civil law circle. There are several theories on the ascription of the result of the enforcing of subrogation, including rule of warehousing, equal contribution and preferential payment. The article divides the creditor＇s rights into two parts： intrinsic rights before the creditor carrying on the fight of subrogation and extrinsic rights for carrying on the fight of subrogation. For different parts, we can take different discharging rules in different cases.