期刊文献+

骨移植在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸后路矫形术的应用研究 被引量:2

Bone graft in the posterior route surgery of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]通过不同植骨在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸后路矫形植骨融合术中的应用比较,探讨其临床应用效果。[方法]回顾性分析2000年~2005年行后路钉-棒系统矫形手术的71例青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者,其中自体骨移植21例(A组),同种异体骨移植23例(B组),自体骨混合同种异体骨移植27例(C组),比较随访第3、9、15、36个月的融合率、Cobb’s角丢失率及假关节发生率。[结果]A组平均融合节段7个,B组平均融合节段7.6个,C组平均融合节段8个。随访的第3个月,融合率、Cobb’s角丢失率及假关节发生率A组、B组、C组无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。第9个月,A组融合率高于B、C两组,A组与B、C组有显著性差异(P〈0.05),B、C组间无显著性差异(P〉0.05),Cobb’s角丢失率及假关节发生率A、B、C组无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。第15、36个月,融合率、Cobb’s角丢失率及假关节发生率A、B、C组无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。[结论]同种异体骨移植、白体骨混合同种异体骨移植与自体骨移植在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸后路矫形手术中对维持矫形效果可取得相近的近远期临床效果。 [ Objective] To compare the clinical resuhs of different bone graft in the posterior route spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. [ Method ] A retrospective study was made in 71 case of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, who were operated on with posterior instrumentation of screw - rod fixation system from 2000 to 2005. All of the patients were divided into three groups, autologous bone graft in 21 cases (group A), allogous bone graft in 23 cases (group B), autologous bone mixed allogous bone graft in 27 cases (group C) . The fusion rate, the Cobb's angle loss rate of incidence and pseudoarthrosis were compared among the three groups at 3, 9, 15, 36 months follow - up. [ Result] There were average number of 7, 7. 6, 8 fused segments in groups A, B, C respectively. The fusion rate, the Cobb' s angle loss rate of incidence and pseudoarthrosis showed no significant difference among the three groups at the 3 month follow - up ( P 〉 0. 05) . The fusion rate of group A was higher than that of group B and C ( P 〈 0. 05 ), but no significant difference between group B and C ( P 〉 0. 05 ), the Cobb' s angle loss rate of incidence and pseudoarthrosis showed no significant difference among the three groups at the 9 months follow - up (P 〉 0.05 ) . There was no significant difference among the three groups at the 15 and 36 months follow - up (P 〉 0. 05 ) . [ Conclusion] There are same recent and long- term clinical results with the three different bone grafts in the posterior route spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第21期1609-1612,共4页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 骨移植 脊柱融合 特发性脊柱侧凸 青少年 bone graft spinal fusion idiopathic scoliosis adolescent
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献39

  • 1朱晓东,刘铁龙,李明,石志才.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者后路髂棘处取骨植骨并发症[J].脊柱外科杂志,2004,2(5):270-271. 被引量:3
  • 2邱勇,朱锋,王斌,俞杨,朱泽章,钱邦平.同种异体骨加自体肋骨治疗特发性胸椎侧凸的疗效分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(10):581-585. 被引量:16
  • 3[1]Alexander R.Vaccaro,MD,Kazuhiro Chiba,MD,Tushar Ch.Patel,MD,John S.Thalgott,MD,et al.Bone grafting alternatives in spinal surgery.The Spine Journal 2 (2002) 206-215
  • 4[2]Thomas E.Mroz,MD,Eric L.Lin,MD,Matthew C.Summit,MS.Biomechanical analysis of allograft bone treated with a noval tissue sterilization process.The Spine Journal 2006;6:34-39
  • 5[4]Brian Kwon,MD,Louis G.Jenis,MD.Carrier materials for spinal fusion.The Spine Journal 2005;5:224S-230S
  • 6[5]Arrinton ED,Smith WJ,Chambers HG.Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting[J]ClinOrthop,1996,329(2):300-9
  • 7[6]Philippe Violas,MD,Madeleine Chapuis,MD,Henri Bracq,MD.Local Autogragt Bone in the Surgical Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.Spine 2004;29;189-192
  • 8[7]Buck BE,Malinen TI,Brown MD.Bone transplantation and the human immunodeficiency virus.An estimate of the risk of AIDS.Clin Orth Rel Res 1989;240;129-36
  • 9[8]Dodd CA,Fergusson CM,Freedmann L,et al.Allogaft versus autograft bone in scliosis surgery.J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70;431-434
  • 10[9]Grogan DP,Kalen V,Ross TI,et al.Use of allograft bone for posterior spinal fusion in idiopathic scliosis.Clin Orthop 1999;369;273-278

共引文献21

同被引文献14

  • 1郝定均,贺宝荣,吴起宁,陈海波,王晓东.TSRH器械在特发性脊柱侧凸中的应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(1):16-18. 被引量:12
  • 2Harrington PR. Surgical instrumentation for management of scoliosis [ J]. Bone Joint Surg Am, 1960,42 : 1448.
  • 3Humke T, Grob D, Scheier H, et al. Cotrel - Dubousset and Hatting- ton instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis : a comparison of long - term results[J]. Eur Spine, 1995,4:280 -283.
  • 4Potter BK, Lehman RA, Kuklo TR, et al. Anatomy and biomechanies of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation [ J ]. Curr Opin Orthop, 2004, 15:133 -144.
  • 5Suk SI,Lee CK,Min HJ,et al. Comparison of Cotrel -Duboussot pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic soohosis [ J ]. lnt Orthop, 1994,18:341 - 346.
  • 6Potter BK, Kuklo TR, Lenke LG,et al. Radiographic outcomes of anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion with thoracic pedicle screws for treatment of Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves[ J ]. Spine,2005,30 : 1859 - 1866.
  • 7Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scaliosis [ J ]. Spine,2004,29:2040 - 2048.
  • 8Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Lenke LG,et al. Surgical revision rates of hooks versus hybrid versus screws versus combined anteroposterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [ J ]. Spine, 2007,32 : 2258 - 2264.
  • 9Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Lenke LG ,et al. Monaxial versus muhiaxial thoracic pedicle screws in the correction of sdolescent idiopathic scoliosis [ J ]. Spine,2007,30:2113 - 2120.
  • 10Dobbs MB,Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Anterior posterior spinal instru- mentation verus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of ad- olescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90 degrees[ J ]. Spine, 2006,20:2386 - 2391.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部