期刊文献+

MR动态增强扫描评估髋部骨髓血流灌注的初步研究 被引量:6

Bone marrow perfusion of the hip evaluated with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI:the preliminary results
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察FLASH序列T1WI动态增强扫描(DCE-MRI)髋部不同部位骨髓时间——信号强度曲线(TIC),分析其血流动力学特点及生理学意义。方法20例志愿者行髋部FLASH序列DCE-T1WI扫描,以双侧髋臼、干骺端及股骨头为研究对象,分别选择感兴趣区(ROI),绘制百分比TIC。读取TIC首次峰值(fE_(max))、最高信号强度(E_(max)),比较不同部位ROI各参数值的差异,分析其微循环血流灌注的特点。结果人体髋臼、干骺端及股骨头fE_(max)分别是(19.09±3.23、9.50±1.48、4.66±0.68)、E_(max)值分别是(25.30±3.64、19.27±1.38、10.31±1.20),三部位fE_(max)、E_(max)值差异均具有统计学意义(F值分别是283.96、235.96,P值均小于0.05)。结论FLASH序列DCE-T1WI可同时评估富血供红骨髓及乏血供黄骨髓微循环的血流灌注。股骨头低血流灌注可能是发生骨坏死的生理学易患因素之一。 Objective To prospectively assess bone marrow perfusion of the hip with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of FLASH sequence T1WI and analyze hemodynamic characteristic and physiological significance in hip. Methods Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI of acetabulum, femoral head and metaphysis was performed in 20 volunteers. The percentage enhancement time-intensity curves (TIC) was drawn in region of interest (ROI) of different locations. The maximum percentage of enhancement at first past (fEmax) , maximum percentage of enhancement (Emax) were evaluated. The values of different ROI were compared in three locations. Results The fEmax and Emax varied widely in the subjects. The values of fEmax (19.09±3.23, 9. 50±1.48, 4.66±0.68) and Emax (25. 30±3. 64,19. 27±1.38,10.31±1.20) were significantly diffenent (P〈0. 05) from acetabulum, metaphysis and femoral head respectively. To contrast bone marrow in acetabulum and metaphysis, the results imply that there were low hemodynamic perfusion in femoral head. Conclusion It is satisfied to assess insufficiency hemodynamic perfusion of femoral head in DCE-MRI of FLASH sequence T1WI. The low hemodynamic perfusion is the potential risk factor of osteonecrosis in femoral head.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期1493-1496,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 山西省青年科技研究基金(2007021053) 山西省青年学科带头人(山西省强校工程专项经费晋教财2007-71) 山西医科大学博士基金(200606) 山西医科大学第二医院博士启动基金(2006012)
关键词 骨髓 磁共振成像 动态增强扫描 Marrow Magnetic resonance imaging Dynamic contrast enhancement Hip
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Lafforgue P. Pathophysiology and natural history of avascular necrosis of bone. Joint Bone Spine, 2006,73(5):500-507.
  • 2Jiang CC, Shih TT. Epiphyseal scar of the femoral head: risk fac tor of osteonecrosis. Radiology, 1994,192(2) :409-412.
  • 3Trueta J, Harrison MH. The normal vascular anatomy of the femoral head in adult man. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1953,35-B(3) :442- 461.
  • 4Padhani AR, Dzik-Jurasz A. Perfusion MR imaging of extracranial tumor angiogenesis. Top Magn Reson Imaging, 2004, 15 (1):41- 57.
  • 5Rahmouni A, Montazel JL, Divine M, et al. Bone marrow with diffuse tumor infiltration in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology, 2003,229(3) :710-717.
  • 6Montazel JL, Divine M, Lepage E, et al. Normal spinal bone marrow in adults: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology, 2003,229(3) :703-709.
  • 7Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, et ah Intracranial mass lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted echo-planar perfusion MR imaging. Radiology, 2002,223 (1) : 11-29.
  • 8Petrella JR, Provenzale JM. MR perfusion imaging of the brain techniques and applications. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 2000, 175 (1) : 207-219.
  • 9Daldrup HE, Shames DM, Husseini W, et al. Quantification of the extraction fraction for gadopentetate across breast cancer capillaries. Magn Reson Med, 1998,40(4) :537-543.
  • 10Brix G, Kiessling F, Lucht R, et al. Microcireulation and microvasculature in breast tumors : pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR image series. Magn Reson Med, 2004,52(2):420-429.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Ozguroglu M,Esen Ersavasti G,Demir G,et al.Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow versus bone marrow biopsy in malignant lymphoma[J].Pathol Oncol Res,1999,5(2):123-128.
  • 2Hoane BR,Shields AF,Porter BA,et al.Detection of lymphomatous bone marrow involvement with magnetic resonance imaging[J].Blood,1991,78(3):728-738.
  • 3Van de Berg BC,Lecouvet FE,Michaux L,et al.Stage I multiple myeloma:value of MR imaging of the bone marrow in the determination of prognosis[J].Radiology,1996,201(1):243-246.
  • 4Lecouvet FE,Vande Berg BC,Michaux L,et al.Stage Ⅲ multiple myeloma:clinical and prognostic value of spinal bone marrow MR imaging[J].Radiology,1998,209(3):653-660.
  • 5Hawighorst H,Libicher M,Knopp MV,et al.Evaluation of angiogenesis and perfusion of bone marrow lesions:role of semiquantitative and quantitative dynamic MRI[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,1999,10(3):286-294.
  • 6Rahmouni A,Montazel JL,Divine M,et al.Bone marrow with diffuse tumor infiltration in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases:dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging[J].Radiology,2003,229(3):710-717.
  • 7Bollow M,Knauf W,Korfel A,et al.Initial experience with dynamic MR imaging in evaluation of normal bone marrow versus malignant bone marrow infiltrations in humans[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,1997,7(1):241-250.
  • 8Moulopoulos LA,Maris TG,Papanikolaou N,et al.Detection of malignant bone marrow involvement with dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging[J].Ann Oncol,2003,14(1):152-158.
  • 9Moehler TM,Hawighorst H,Neben K,et al.Bone marrow microcirculation analysis in multiple myeloma by contrast enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging[J].Int J Cancer,2001,93(6):862-868.
  • 10Padro T,Ruiz S,Bieker R,et al.Increased angiogenesis in the bone marrow of patients with acute myeloid leukemia[J].Blood,2000,95(8):2637-2644.

共引文献3

同被引文献37

引证文献6

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部