期刊文献+

动态血压多变量与原发性高血压左室重构的关系

Relationship between ambulatory blood pressure multi-parameters and left ventricular remodeling in patients with essential hypertension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:利用动态血压监测技术分析其变量与原发性高血压患者左室重构的关系.方法:选择1级、2级原发性高血压病患者138例进行动态血压及超声心动图检查,依据左室构型将高血压病患者分为4组:正常左室构型组,向心性重构组,向心性肥厚组和离心性肥厚组.对4组的动态血压各项指标进行统计学方差分析.结果:4组间收缩压各项指标均有统计学差异(P<0.05):第3组与第4组的24h平均收缩压(24hSBp)、夜间平均收缩压(nSBp)和收缩压负荷(SBp负荷)值均较第1组和第2组高,第3组的白昼平均收缩压(dSBp)较其他3组高;在舒张压指标方面:第3组与第4组的夜间舒张压较第1组和第2组高,其余舒张压指标无统计学差异.结论:收缩压水平是高血压左室构型改变的重要危险因素. AIM: To explore the relationship between left ventricular remodeling (LVR) and ambulatory blood pressure multiparameters in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: 138 patients with grade Ⅰ or Ⅱ essential hypertension were divided into 4 groups based on Ganau Criteria: normal ventricular configuration, centrality remodeling group, concentric hypertrophy group, and eccentric hypertrophy group. Ambulatory blood pressure multi-parameters were determined with the use of statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were differences in the indices of systolic pressure between the 4 groups. 24 h SBp, nSBp, and dSBp were higher in group 1, 2 than in group 3, d. dSBp was higher in group 3 than in group 1 , 2, 4. There were differences in diastolic pressure at night between group 1,2 and group 3, 4. No significant difference in other indices of diastolic pressure was observed. CONCLUSION: Indices of systolic pressure are risk factors in left ventricle remodeling.
出处 《第四军医大学学报》 北大核心 2008年第18期1703-1705,共3页 Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University
关键词 高血压 左室重构 血压测定 hypertension left ventricle remodeling blood pressure determination
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献29

  • 1张廷杰.高血压干预试验──硝苯地平与安慰剂随机对照研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,1994,22(3):201-205. 被引量:20
  • 2张黎明,刘建华.老年自发性高血压大鼠血压波动性与靶器官损伤[J].高血压杂志,1996,4(1):7-10. 被引量:38
  • 3Parati G, Pomidossi G, Albini F, et al. Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension. J Hypertens, 1987, 5: 93-98.
  • 4Su DF, Miao CY. Blood pressure variability and organ damage. Clin Exp Phannacol Physiol, 2001, 28: 709-715.
  • 5Miao CY, Tao X, Gong K, et al. Arterial remodeling in chronic sinoaortic-denervated rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 2001, 37: 6-15.
  • 6Shan ZZ, Dai SM, Su DF. Arterial baroreflex deficit induced organ damage in sinoaortic denervated rats. J Cardiovas Pharmacol, 2001,38 : 427-437.
  • 7Miao CY, Su DF. The importance of blood pressure variability in rat aortic and ventricular hypertrophy produced by sinoaortic denervation. J Hyportens, 2002, 20 : 1865-1872.
  • 8Miao CY, Yuan WJ, Su DF. Comparative study of sinoaortic denervated rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Hypertens, 2003, 16: 585-591.
  • 9Miao CY, Zhang LM, Yuan WJ, et al. Angiotensin Ⅱ and AT1 receptor in hypertrophied ventricles and aortas of sinoaorticdenervated rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin, 2003, 24 : 812-818.
  • 10Tao X, Zhang SH, Chu ZX, et al. Apoptosis is involved in the cardiac damage induced by sinoaortic denervation in rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 2003, 30: 362-368.

共引文献1072

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部