期刊文献+

Physiological and Growth Responses of C_3 and C_4 Plants to Reduced Temperature When Grown at Low CO_2 of the Last Ice Age 被引量:5

Physiological and Growth Responses of C_3 and C_4 Plants to Reduced Temperature When Grown at Low CO_2 of the Last Ice Age
原文传递
导出
摘要 During the last ice age, CO2 concentration ([CO2]) was 180-200 umol/mol compared with the modern value of 380 umol/mol, and global temperatures were -8 ℃ cooler. Relatively little is known about the responses of C3 and C4 species to longterm exposure to glacial conditions. Here Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (C3) and Amaranthus retroflexus L. (C4) were grown at 200 umol/mol CO2 with current (30/24℃) and glacial (22/16℃) temperatures for 22d. Overall, the C4 species exhibited a large growth advantage over the C3 species at low [CO2]. However, this advantage was reduced at low temperature, where the C4 species produced 5x the total mass of the C3 species versus 14x at the high temperature. This difference was due to a reduction in C4 growth at low temperature, since the C3 species exhibited similar growth between temperatures. Physiological differences between temperatures were not detected for either species, although photorespiration/net photosynthesis was reduced in the C3 species grown at low temperature, suggesting evidence of improved carbon balance at this treatment. This system suggests that C4 species had a growth advantage over C3 species during low [CO2] of the last ice age, although concurrent reductions in temperatures may have reduced this advantage. During the last ice age, CO2 concentration ([CO2]) was 180-200 umol/mol compared with the modern value of 380 umol/mol, and global temperatures were -8 ℃ cooler. Relatively little is known about the responses of C3 and C4 species to longterm exposure to glacial conditions. Here Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (C3) and Amaranthus retroflexus L. (C4) were grown at 200 umol/mol CO2 with current (30/24℃) and glacial (22/16℃) temperatures for 22d. Overall, the C4 species exhibited a large growth advantage over the C3 species at low [CO2]. However, this advantage was reduced at low temperature, where the C4 species produced 5x the total mass of the C3 species versus 14x at the high temperature. This difference was due to a reduction in C4 growth at low temperature, since the C3 species exhibited similar growth between temperatures. Physiological differences between temperatures were not detected for either species, although photorespiration/net photosynthesis was reduced in the C3 species grown at low temperature, suggesting evidence of improved carbon balance at this treatment. This system suggests that C4 species had a growth advantage over C3 species during low [CO2] of the last ice age, although concurrent reductions in temperatures may have reduced this advantage.
出处 《Journal of Integrative Plant Biology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2008年第11期1388-1395,共8页 植物学报(英文版)
基金 Supported by the US Department of Energy (DE-FG02-95ER62124) the US National Science Foundation (0517668 and 0746822) an American Fellowship to JK Ward from the American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
关键词 Abutilon theophrasti Amaranthus retroflexus C3 species C4 species climate change low CO2 low temperature PHOTORESPIRATION Pleistocene. Abutilon theophrasti Amaranthus retroflexus C3 species C4 species climate change low CO2 low temperature photorespiration Pleistocene.
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1Ackerly DD, Coleman JS, Morse SR, Bazzaz FA (1992). CO2 and temperature effects on leaf area production in two annual plant species. Ecology 73,1260-1269.
  • 2Anderson L J, Maherali H, Johnson HB, Polley HW, Jackson RB (2001). Gas exchange and photosynthetic acclimation over subambient to elevated CO2 in a C3-C4 grassland. Glob. Change Biol. 7, 693-707.
  • 3Berry J, Bjorkman O (1980). Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31,491- 543.
  • 4Cerling TE, Ehleringer JR, Harris JM (1998). Carbon dioxide starvation, the development of C4 ecosystems, and mammalian evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 353, 159-171.
  • 5Cerling TE, Harris JM, MacFadden B J, Leakey MG, Quade J, Eisenrnann Vet al. (1997). Global vegetation through the Miocene/Pliocene boundary. Nature 389, 153-158.
  • 6Coleman JS, Bazzaz FA (1992). Effects of CO2 and temperature on growth and resource use of co-occurring C3 and C4 annuals. Ecology 73, 1244-1259.
  • 7Coltrain JB, Harris JM, Cerling TE, Ehleringer JR, Dearing MD, Ward JK et al. (2004). Rancho La Brea stable isotope biogeochemistry and its implication for the palaeoecology of late Pleistocene, coastal southern California. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 205, 199-219.
  • 8Cowling SA (1999). Plants and temperature- CO2 uncoupling. Science 285, 1500-1501.
  • 9Cowling SA, Sage RF (1998). Interactive effects of low atmospheric CO2 and elevated temperature on growth, photosynthesis and respiration in Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Cell Environ. 21,427-435.
  • 10Dewar RC, Medlyn BE, McMurtrie RE (1999). Acclimation of the respiration/photosynthesis ratio to temperature: insights from a model. Glob. Change Biol. 5, 615-622.

同被引文献60

引证文献5

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部