期刊文献+

彼彻姆和查瑞斯的原则主义进路及其改进 被引量:2

Beauchamp and Childress' Principlism Approach and Its Improvement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在全球化、多元化背景下,彼彻姆和查瑞斯通过寻找普世原则来容纳道德多元主义和避免道德相对主义,进而为医学伦理学提供一系列清晰、明确、有效的道德规范的努力无疑是可贵的,但其原则主义存在的突出问题是反思平衡方法在实践中不能有效解决根本性的道德冲突。针对这一不足,我们尝试提出解决道德冲突的更有希望的思路。 In the background of globalization and pluralism, the effort which Beauchamp and Childress have made to seek for some general principles in order to avoid moral relativism and to accommodate moral pluralism, and provide a series of clear, explicit and effective moral norms for medical ethics,is no doubt valuable. A prominent problem with Beauchamp and Childress' principlism is that the method of "reflective equilibrium" often fails to solve basic moral conflicts successfully in practice. Aiming at this deficiency, we try to suggest a more hopeful thought to solve moral conflicts.
出处 《医学与哲学(A)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第11期40-42,共3页 Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
基金 广东省普通高校人文社会科学"十一五"规划研究项目重点课题"医务人员行医行为规范体系研究" 项目编号:06ZD72001
关键词 医学伦理学 原则主义 冲突 对话 medical ethics, priciplism, conflict, dialogue
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1DeGrazia D. Common Morality, Coherence and the Principles of Bi omedical Ethics [J]. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2003, (13) :227.
  • 2Green R M, Gert B, Clouser K D. The method of public morality versus the method of principlism[J].Journal of Medicine and Phi losophy, 199:3, (18) : 477.
  • 3Beauchamp T L, DeGrazia, D. Principle and Princilism[M]// George K. Handbook of Bioethics. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004 : 57.
  • 4Beauchamp T L. Principlism and its Alleged Competitors[J].Ken nedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1995(5) :181.
  • 5Beauchamp T I. , Childress J F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics [M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 2001(3):398.
  • 6Richardson H S. Specifying Norms as a Way to Resolve Concrete Ethical Problems[J].Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1990(19) : 279-310.
  • 7约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2003..
  • 8Gert B,Culver C M,Clouser D. Bioethics: A Return toFundamentals[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997:71.
  • 9亨利·西季威克.伦理学方法[M].廖申白,译.北京:中国社会科学,1997:36-38.
  • 10恩格尔·哈特.生命伦理学的基础[M].范瑞平,译.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1996:2.

共引文献36

同被引文献22

  • 1杜治政.论医学中的人道功利主义[J].医学与哲学,1993,14(8):4-7. 被引量:7
  • 2王波,孙艳.论医学模式的演变与医务社会工作概念的发展[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2006,21(4):16-19. 被引量:17
  • 3BANTA D. What is technology assessment? [ J]. International Jour- nal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2009 ( Suppl 1 ) : 7.
  • 4BRAUNACK - MAYER A J. Ethics and Health Technology Assess- ment: Handmaiden and/or Critic? [ J]. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2006, 22 (3) :307 - 312.
  • 5HOFMANN B M. Why ethics should be part of health technology as- sessment [ J ]. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2008, 24(4):423-429.
  • 6TEN HAVE H. Ethical perspective on health technology assessment [ J]. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2004, 20(1) :71 -76.
  • 7HOFMANN B. Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment [ J]. International Journal of Technolo- gy Assessment in Health Care, 2005, 21 ( 3 ) :312 - 318.
  • 8BUELS A, CARON L, DE LANGAVANT G C. Tackling ethical is- sues in health technology assessment: A proposed framework [ J]. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2011, 27(3) :230 -237.
  • 9DEGRAZIA D. Common Morality, Coherence and the Principles of Biomedical Ethics [ J]. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2003, 13(2) :219 -230.
  • 10周桂田,徐健铭.建构开放与民主的社会对话之决策程序:参与式科技评估[J].人文与社会科学简讯,2013,14(4):43-50.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部