摘要
在全球化、多元化背景下,彼彻姆和查瑞斯通过寻找普世原则来容纳道德多元主义和避免道德相对主义,进而为医学伦理学提供一系列清晰、明确、有效的道德规范的努力无疑是可贵的,但其原则主义存在的突出问题是反思平衡方法在实践中不能有效解决根本性的道德冲突。针对这一不足,我们尝试提出解决道德冲突的更有希望的思路。
In the background of globalization and pluralism, the effort which Beauchamp and Childress have made to seek for some general principles in order to avoid moral relativism and to accommodate moral pluralism, and provide a series of clear, explicit and effective moral norms for medical ethics,is no doubt valuable. A prominent problem with Beauchamp and Childress' principlism is that the method of "reflective equilibrium" often fails to solve basic moral conflicts successfully in practice. Aiming at this deficiency, we try to suggest a more hopeful thought to solve moral conflicts.
出处
《医学与哲学(A)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第11期40-42,共3页
Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
基金
广东省普通高校人文社会科学"十一五"规划研究项目重点课题"医务人员行医行为规范体系研究"
项目编号:06ZD72001
关键词
医学伦理学
原则主义
冲突
对话
medical ethics, priciplism, conflict, dialogue