论假想防卫的罪过形式

On the Sin Form of the Imaginative Defence

假想防卫的罪过形式,无论在实践中还是理论上历来存在争议。对其进行研究无论是对司法认定还是刑法理论都有重要意义。认定假想防卫罪过形式应从分析故意和过失各自的实质含义着手。有罪过的假想防卫不可能是故意犯罪行为,而应当是过失犯罪,其罪过形式不仅包括疏忽大意的过失,还应包括过于自信的过失。

There are always some arguments about the sin form of imaginary defence, this will have important significance to study that whether to the judiciary or criminal law theory. From analysising of intentional fault of their own and real meaning,this article gives synthesis and assessmento on the various viewpoints , puts forward a hypothetical that sin fore of imaginary defense of can not be a deliberate criminal act, and it should be criminal negligence . The sin form of the imaginary defence should not only be the fault of negligence, but also the fault of self-confidence.