摘要
黄浩博士所谓的"后文学时代"与其所谓的"文学经典时代"一样是虚假的,它严重歪曲了文学生活的本相。从历史发展的角度看,也许存在着一个"后文学时代",但它不是也不可能像黄浩博士所"描绘"和"规定"的那样。那它是何样子的呢?要回答这样一个吃力且不易于讨好的问题,除黄浩博士所特别看重的"理论勇气"和"历史责任感"之外,还应该尊重客观事实,依循学理要求,并且有足够的耐心。
Like his 'age of classical literature,' Dr. Huang Hao’s 'post-literature period' is false,for it severely distorts the essence of literary life. From the perspective of historical development, there might exist an age of 'post-literature.' However,it was not,and could not have been,what Huang Hao 'described' and 'prescribed.' Then what on earth is it like? To answer this tough and thorny question,objective facts must be respected,the requirements for the principles of learning must be observed,and enough patience must be gathered,besides the 'theoretical courage' and 'sense of historical responsibility' suggested by Huang Hao.
出处
《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2008年第5期5-10,共6页
Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
学术批评
学术研究
背离学理
文学生活
本相
academic criticism
academic research
against principles of learning
literary life