期刊文献+

全局决策树方法在核电站人员可靠性分析中的应用研究 被引量:3

A method and application study on holistic decision tree for human reliability analysis in nuclear power plant
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以核电厂人员可靠性分析中的全局决策树方法及其应用研究为主要内容。重点介绍全局决策树方法的基本框架、背景和实施步骤。结合秦山二期核电厂的人员可靠性现场访谈形成影响因子和品质等级描述,并以SLOCA和SGTR为例进行全局决策树方法分析。该方法以图形化决策树的形式,综合考虑了各个影响因子对人误概率的影响。分析表明该方法能够适应人误分析过程中出现的不确定性,具有较高的可靠性和实用性。 The paper introduces a human reliability analysis method mainly used in Nuclear Power Plant Safety Assessment and the Holistic Decision Tree (HDT) method and how to apply it. The focus is primarily on providing the basic framework and some background of HDT method and steps to perform it. Influence factors and quality descriptors are formed by the interview with operators in Qinshan Nuclear Power Plant and HDT analysis performed for SGTR and SLOCA based on this information. The HDT model can use a graphic tree structure to indicate that error rate is a function of influence factors. HDT method is capable of dealing with the uncertainty in HRA, and it is reliable and practical.
出处 《核科学与工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第3期268-272,共5页 Nuclear Science and Engineering
关键词 人员可靠性分析 全局决策树 影响因子 品质等级描述 human reliability analysis holistic decision tree influence factor quality descriptor
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Swain A D. Handbook of Human-Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications Final Report[M]. NUREG-RC1278, 1983.
  • 2Hannaman G W. Human Cognitive Reliability Model for PRA Analysis[M]. NUS-4531,1984.
  • 3IAEA, Human Reliability Analysis in Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants[S]. Safety Series NO. 50-P-10, VIENNA,1995.
  • 4Probabilistic Safety Assessment Level-1 For Internal Initiating Events-Main Report[R]. NOVOVORONEZH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, 1999.
  • 5何旭洪.HRA培训教材[R].北京:清华大学核研院,2006.

同被引文献24

  • 1张锦,张力.一种人因可靠性分析(HRA)方法[J].安全与环境学报,2003,3(2):62-64. 被引量:15
  • 2沈祖培,王遥,高佳.人因失误的后果-前因追溯表[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(6):799-802. 被引量:32
  • 3王洪德,高玮.基于人的认知可靠性(HCR)模型的人因操作失误研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(7):51-56. 被引量:33
  • 4Civil Aviation Authority.An Introduction to Aircraft Maintenance Engineering Human Factors for JAR 66[R].UK:CivilAviation Authority,2002.
  • 5Crotty,B.J.Considering maintenance human and organizational factors and related errors during aircraft accident andincident investigations[C].International Society of Air Safety Investigators Conference(ISASI 2002):Global Challengesin Accident Investigation and Safety Improvement,2002:56-59.
  • 6Wiegmann,D.A,Shappell,S.A.A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis[M].England:AshgatePublishing,2003:45-70.
  • 7Krulak,D.C.Human factors in maintenance-impact on aircraft mishap frequency and severity[J].Aviation,Space,andEnvironmental Medicine,2004,75(5):429-432.
  • 8Yu-Hern Chang,Ying-Chun Wang.Significant human risk factors in aircraft maintenance technicians[J].SafetyScience,2010,48(1):54–62.
  • 9钟晓芳.基于模糊德菲法和熵权重法的手机开发应用研究[C].江苏省现场统计研究会第11次学术年会论文集,2008:134-137.
  • 10BOT P L.Human reliability data,human error and accident models-illustration through the Three Mile Island accident analysis[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2004,83(2):153-167.

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部