期刊文献+

公司治理理论的现代演变——从股东利益最大化到相关利益者理论 被引量:6

The Modern Evolution of Corporate Governance Theory——From Shareholder Benefit Maximization to Stakeholder Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 全球的公司治理模式简要分为两类:股东模式和相关利益者模式。以最大化股东利益为目标的股东模式在董事会、大股东和公司控制权市场这些内部和外部治理机制上都存在明显的缺陷或失败。相关利益者理论的发展导致了公司治理理论的现代演变。相关利益者理论认为,公司治理从本质上说是各相关利益者之间制衡关系的有机整合,其目标是最大化整个公司的财富创造。相关利益者公司治理成为可替代股东模式的公司治理形式。 Corporate governance models in the world can be simply classified into two kinds: shareholder model and stakeholder model. The shareholder model, which aims at maximizing shareholders benefit has obvious flaw or failure in the inside and outside governance mechanisms of BOD, substantial shareholder and corporate control market. The development of the stakeholder theory brings about the modem evolution of corporate governance theory. Stakeholder theory holds the essence of corporate governance is the integration of the balancing relationships between stakeholders and its goal is the maximization of the value creation for the whole company. Stakeholder model for corporate governance becomes the feasible substitute for the shareholder model.
出处 《经济经纬》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期108-111,共4页 Economic Survey
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70772099) 广东省自然科学基金项目(7300574) 广东省普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地创新团队项目(07JDTDXM63003)
关键词 公司治理 股东利益至上 相关利益者理论 corporate governance shareholder benefit maximization stakeholder theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1布莱尔.1996.所有权与控制:面向21世纪的公司治理探索[M].张荣刚,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社.
  • 2沈艺峰,林志扬.相关利益者理论评析[J].经济管理,2001,27(8):19-24. 被引量:44
  • 3BAYSINGE B D, BULTER H D. 1985. Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition[ J ]. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, ( 1 ) : 650 - 657.
  • 4BERLE A, MEANS G. 1932. Private Property and the Modem Corporation[ M ]. New York : Macmillan.
  • 5BYRD J W, HICKMAN K A. 1992. Do Outside Directors Monitor Managers? [ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, (32) : 195 -221.
  • 6CHEFFINS B. 1997. Company Law: Theory, Structure, and Operation [ M ]. London : Oxford University Press.
  • 7DONALDSON T, PRESTON L E. 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation : Concepts, Evidence, and Implications [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, ( 20 ) : 65 -91.
  • 8FREEMAN R E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach[ M]. Boston:Pitman Publishing Inc.
  • 9HERMALIN B E, WEISBACH M S. 2000. Board of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature[J]. Economic Policy Review, 9(1): 7-26.
  • 10JENSEN M, MECKLING W. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, ( 3 ) : 305 - 360.

二级参考文献33

  • 1约翰.凯奥伯利.西尔伯斯通.关于“利益相关者”的争论——公司的治理结构[J].经济社会体制比较,1996(3):41-47. 被引量:29
  • 2玛格丽特·M·布莱尔.共同的所有权[J].经济社会体制比较,1996,(3).
  • 3布莱尔.《所有权与控制:面向21世纪的公司治理探索》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1999..
  • 4伯利和米园斯.《私有财产与现代公司》,麦子克米伦出版公司,1932年,第7章,第7页.
  • 5詹纳森 普雷斯顿.“公司相关利益者理论:概念、证据和应用”[J].管理学会评论,1995,20:65-65.
  • 6詹森.“现代工业的进行、退出和内部控制制度的失败”[J].财务学刊,1993,48:836-836.
  • 7《20世纪80年代美国经济政策》,[美]马丁·费尔德斯坦主蝙,经济科学出版社,2000年版.
  • 8西泽切克 德塞特西凯斯.“地方州对公司控制权市场的干预”[J].财务经济学刊,1992,51:8-8.
  • 9伊斯特布鲁克 费歇尔.“公司法里的表决权”[J].法学与经济学刊,1983,25:398-397.
  • 10科斯.“社会成本问题”[J].法学与经济学刊,1960,5:44-44.

共引文献43

同被引文献30

  • 1Carroll A B.A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance,1979(04).
  • 2徐向艺;徐宁.比较管理:现代公司治理理论演进:经济学与法学的视角[J],2010(01).
  • 3徐向艺,徐宁.现代公司治理理论演进:经济学与法学的视角[J].比较管理.2010(01)
  • 4Preston Lee E,O’Bannon Douglas P.The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis[].Business and Society.1997
  • 5Wartick S L,Cohran P L.The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model[].The Academy of Management Journal.1985
  • 6EU Commission.Green Paper:Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility[]..2001
  • 7Matten,Dirk,Crane Andrew.Corporate citizenship:Toward a extended theoretical conceptualization[].A cade my of Management Review.2005
  • 8Aupperle KE,Carroll AB,Hatfield JD.An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability[].The Academy of Management Journal.1985
  • 9Frederick."From CSR1 to CSR2"[].Business and Society.1994
  • 10Carroll AB.Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct[].Business and Society.1999

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部